False Claims Act A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 词条 中文 《虚假陈述法》 解释 〈美〉 一项联邦法律,它规定有以下行为者应承担民事及刑事责任:故意向政府提供虚假陈述或申诉,向政府少交应付金额,制造或使用虚假记录以减少对政府的义务。
The qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act empower whistleblowers—individuals with non-public knowledge of fraud against the government—to file a lawsuit on behalf of the government. The qui tam whistleblower in this case will receive $3.91 million or 17% of the settlement. Summary of ...
[4]SeePress Release, U.S. Atty’s Office for the Dist. of Vt., Electronic Health Records Vendor NextGen Healthcare, Inc. to Pay $31 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations (July 14, 2023),https://www.justice.gov/usao-vt/pr/electronic-health-records-vendor-nextgen-healthcare-inc...
false claims act 读音:美英 false claims act基本解释 (美)《虚假陈述法》 分词解释 FALSE虚伪的 claims(根据权利而提出的)要求( claim的名词复数 ) act行动 false claims act是什么意思 false claims act怎么读 false claims act在线翻译 false claims act中文意思 false claims act的解释 false claims act的...
The False Claims Act does not explicitly define what it means for a claim to be “false or fraudulent.” However, courts have interpreted these terms very broadly. TheSupreme Court of the United Stateshas stated that the phrase “false or fraudulent claim” reaches “all types of fraud, with...
Alexander B. Ginsberg
A complete overview of the Federal false claims act (FCA) - the secret weapon of of the Govt. used to combat fraud and incentivize whistleblowers. See the important parts of this litigation tool explained simply.
You can be held liable under the False Claims Act when: You knowingly present a false claim for payment. You knowingly make or use a false record to make a false claim. You knowingly use or make a false record or statement to avoid, conceal, or change the amount of money to be paid...
美国《虚假申报法》(false claims act)对揭发欺诈政府行为有类似奖励,催生了一个数十亿美元规模、专事医疗申报领域的律师 … www.ftchinese.com|基于50个网页 3. 虚假申报法案 根据美国《虚假申报法案》(False Claims Act),公民可代表政府起诉虚假申报者,并分享一定的赔偿金。佛罗里达州的一家名 … ...
Supreme Court held that that “[t]he False Claims Act’s scienter element refers to the pharmacies’ knowledge and subjective beliefs (not to what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed).1,2 The Supreme Court further opined that the basis for determining the parties’ “...