Part III looks at the factors that contribute to the ability to misuse orders of protection. Part IV discusses due process and ex parte orders of protection. Part V is a survey of the state statutory schemes. Specifically, it analyzes participation by judicial officers, prompt post-deprivation ...
Judicial Dispositions of Ex-Parte and Domestic Violence Protection Order Hearings: A Comparative Analysis of Victims Requests and Court Authorized Relief - Yearwood - 2005 () Citation Context ...hared place of residency. The greatest discordance occurred between the percent of plaintiffs requesting ...
Banks posted screenshots of the October 16 order to her Instagram story, writing, “Just when you thought it was safe!” Vafa also applauded the ruling. “After unnecessary litigation and pressure caused when recently substituting this matter, we are happy that the Court agreed...
Domestic ViolenceOrders of ProtectionProtection OrdersRestraining OrdersJudicial Decision MakingCognitive PsychologyBerkeley Electronic Press Selected Worksdoi:10.2139/ssrn.2842837Stark, Debra PogrundChoplin, Jessica M.SSRN Electronic Journal
Victims are empowered.., by their alliance with criminal justice agencies. Threatened sanctions for continuing abuse, whether made explicitly by victims or implicitly by the attention of the state, are made credible by the state's willingness to exercise its power.Schouvieller, MaryLaw & Ineq...
Ten Reasons Against a Proposal for Ex Parte Interim Measures of Protection in Arbitration. Hans Van Houtte. Arbitration International . 2004Hans Van Houtte.Ten Reasons Against a Proposal for Ex Parte Interim Measures of Protection in Arbitration.Arbitration International. 2004...
Ten Reasons Against a Proposal for Ex Parte Interim Measures of Protection in Arbitration. Hans Van Houtte. Arbitration International . 2004Hans Van Houtte.Ten Reasons Against a Proposal for Ex Parte Interim Measures of Protection in Arbitration.Arbitration International. 2004...
Federalizing Trade Secret Protection: A Close Look at Ex Parte Seizure ProvisionRachel Weiner Cohen
Case C-44/95, R. v. Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Judgment of the Court of Justice 11 July 1996, [1996] ECR I-3805doi:10.54648/148721J. HolderCommon Market Law Review
Baiardi, KatWisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society