in respect of which the Court could not rely on Mr Melia’s integrity because he had shown himself to be willing to lie in the retrospective planning application once he had been found out, and (in respect of the receipt of the
There is a line of case law (considered by the Court in this case) which provides that "consequential loss" is understood to mean damage falling within the second limb of the remoteness test inHadley v Baxendale[1]...
This was mostly a factual assessment (is there a clear demonstration of consent to choice of court) which Lord Hodge for the SC held Teare J and the Court of Appeal both had absolutely right. Lord Hodge refers in supportto a wealth of CJEU and English (as well as Singapore) courts on ...
The first was whether the French criminal proceedings, which were first in time, were related to the English Commercial Court action. The second was whether the High Court, as the Court second seised, should stay these proceedings, it being accepted that it had the power to do so under A3...
After considering Titan's arguments based on the legislative history and meaning of the phrase "in the course of business" as held in case law in respect to other legislation, Mr Justice Steel supported RBS's view that the phrase should be given......
The Meaning of 'Deposit': Thames Water v Bromley Magistrates' Court Theecent decisionfheighourt (Administrativeourt) inhames Water vromleyagistrates'ourt [2013] EWHC 472 (Admin), [2013] Env LR 25 exemplifiesheensions presen... Emma,Lees - 《Journal of Environmental Law》 被引量: 0发表:...
He essentially (at 43) posits the court reconsider ‘whether Article 7(2) RJR is ‘to be interpreted as meaning that a natural person who alleges that his personality rights have been infringed by the publication of information concerning him on the internet may have his centre of interests ...
b) Whether the Court should stay proceedings against the English Defendants (who are sued in accordance with Article 4 of the recast Brussels Regulation) in favour of proceedings in Ukraine. The issue here is as to the meaning, effect and application of Article 34 of the Regulation, which as...
“standalone” rather than “follow-on” actions, and the Decision is not binding on the court so far as the claims against the Defendants are concerned, as it would have been had the Defendants been addressees. Nevertheless, Claimants place considerable reliance upon the evidential effect of ...
to take into consideration factors such as the fact that that person carried out a high volume of transactions within a relatively short period or that he or she invested significant sums in those transactions, or that that person is a ‘retail client’ within the meaning of A4(1) point 12...