MDPI recognizes the opportunities and challenges presented by the rapid development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) such as ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) for scholarly publishing. In order to provide transparency to the academic community, MDPI has developed the following...
The article in this issue ‘Threats and offers in community healthcare’2 is an exemplar of how we can research and write about psychiatric ethics in a way that is not only rigorous from a scholarly point of view, but also genuinelyJohn R McMillan...
Furthermore, MDPI journals uphold a rigorous peer-review process together with clear ethical policies and standards to support the addition of high-quality scientific studies to the field of scholarly publication. Where we become aware of ethical issues, we are committed to investigating and taking n...
Healthcare goes beyond curing patients and combating illnesses. Raising awareness about diseases, informing people about prevention methods, discussing some good practices, or even talking about a balanced diet—there are many topics related to medicine that you could... Multi-purpose 16:9 Like ...
such asU.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and associated guidelines, orEU Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, or theU.S. Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and, as applicable, the Animal Welfare Act...
Submissions containing suspected plagiarism, in whole or part, will be rejected. If plagiarism is discovered after publication, we will act according to the section below on “Correcting the Scholarly Record”. Duplicate or redundant publication, or ‘self-plagiarism’, occurs when a work, or ...
When scholars look at the duo from various angles, they tend to attach different notions & meanings to these theoretical frameworks, which results in a unique framing of problems and, thus, a struggle to find common ground for understanding each other. Overview of scholarly works on stakeholder ...
in the past, when writing my own scholarly articles, Ihavechecked footnoted references, and sometime discovered that they were like Silver’s link—not what they were represented as supporting by the author. I am told by litigators that it is shocking how many cases cited in the memos and ...
Persistent scholarly criticism often prompts reexamination of a legal doctrine and sometimes even leads to the abandonment of an established judicial position. In the Anglo-American systems, legal writing has certainly become influential, as indicated by the increase in citations to secondary sources ...
What he is describing is a culture-wide phenomenon that is far more insidious than its effects on scholarly book reviews alone. I also want to salute Curmie for slyly paying homage in his section about typos to one of my own most common and annoying typos. I know it was no coincidence....