此外,2023年10月20日,美国环境保护署(EPA)最终制定了规则,提供更详细的毒性释放清单(Toxics Release Inventory)中的PFAS报告。 通过取消一项豁免规定,改进了对PFAS在毒性释放清单(TRI)上的报告,以更全面地监测这些永久化学品。这项规定取消了工厂在使用低浓度PFAS时避免报告相关信息的权利,因为PFAS通常以低浓度在各种...
2025年1月3日,美国环保署(EPA)公布,根据2020财年国防授权法案(NDAA)的规定,新增9种全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)纳入美国有毒物质释放清单(TRI)。此次新增将使得TRI清单中的PFAS种类总数达到205种。 EPA规定,被列为“特别关注的化学物质”的物质,包括PFAS,将不再适用于TRI供应商报告的最小豁免条件。这意味着,TRI清...
2025年1月3日,美国环保署(EPA)公布,新增9种全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)纳入美国有毒物质释放清单(TRI),至此,TRI清单中的PFAS种类总数达到205种; 2025年1月3日,美国环保署(EPA)公布,根据2020财年国防授权法案(NDAA)的规定,新增9种全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)纳入美国有毒物质释放清单(TRI)。此次 新增将...
推动国会将PFAS纳入《有毒物质排放清单》(TRI),明确企业环保责任。 3. 构建合作网络 与各州及部落政府合作,评估PFAS污染风险并制定解决方案。 加快污染场地修复,优先保护饮用水供应安全。 支持地方政府执法,严惩非法排放行为。 公开征求公众对生物固体风险评估的意见,完善后续政策。 此次公布的举措仅是EPA应对PFAS污染的...
2025年1月3日,美国环保署(EPA)公布,根据2020财年国防授权法案(NDAA)的规定,新增9种全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)纳入美国有毒物质释放清单(TRI)。此次新增将使得TRI清单中的PFAS种类总数达到205种。 EPA规定,被列为“特别关注的化学物质”的物质,包括PFAS,将不再适用于TRI供应商报告的最小豁免条件。这意味着,TRI...
EPA has issued a final Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) rule that eliminates a Trump-era reporting exemption for de minimis amounts of PFAS and removes the de minimis exemption for all chemicals of special concern, such as dioxins, when notifying downstream manufacturers and purchasers, expanding ...
EPA has issued a final rule adding five per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to the 170-plus list of PFAS that are subject to reporting requirements under the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), adding three related compounds triggered by an EPA toxici
To provide clear information on which chemicals fall under the NDAA requirement, in February 2020, EPA released a list of 172 PFAS chemicals that are subject to TRI reporting. Facilities in TRI-covered industry sectors should track and collect data on these PFAS during 2020. All TRI reporting ...
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently announced the addition of nine PFAS substances to the list of those covered by the Toxics Release Inventory (or TRI), bringing the total number of TRI-listed PFAS substances to 205. The inclusion comes as a result of the 2020 National...
the test order “will not only improve the Agency’s understanding of human health effects of HFPO-DAF, but also the potential effects of dozens of PFAS that are structurally similar to HFPO-DAF and in the same Testing Strategy category of PFAS,” improving EPA’s overall data on PFAS. ...