as well as new definitions for infrastructure projects, capital, and new commercial enterprise resulting from the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 for petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022. • Aligns
對於有興趣移民美國的人來說,5 年 EB-2022 改革與誠信法案是一個廣受歡迎的消息。 該法案做出的修改有利於申請 EB-5 綠卡的人。 以下是該法案對 EB-5 計劃做出的一些更重要的改變。 減少EB-5 簽證的不確定性 《EB-5 改革與誠信法案》重新授權 EB-5 區域中心直至 2027 年。在該法案出台之前,國會每年都...
根据《EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022》(《2022年EB-5改革和诚信法案》)的要求及移民局指引,在区域中心递交项目预审批(I-956F)申请之前,潜在的EB-5申请人不能递交I-526E申请。一旦区域中心收到移民局的确认其递交I-956F表的接收通知,申请人可以根据该接收通知递交其相关I-526E表。 此外,值得关注的...
美国时间3月8日,国会传来了一份EB-5新草案,名为:“EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visa and Regional Center Program Comprehensive Reform Act”,即“EB-5 Reform Act”。草案条款包括增加最低投资额至92.5万美元、签证预留、增加申请费等,并可能在3月23日颁布。 该草案是在移民局欲以行政手段把EB-5投资款从最低5...
Of the 3,000+ EB-5 investments made since the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022, I doubt many were in projects offering a two-year exit strategy, even though such projects have been technically allowable immigration-wise under USCIS interpretation of RIA. Investment holding periods around...
值得注意的是,早在2022年,国会已明确通过《EB-5改革与诚信法案》(EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act),将EB-5“区域中心”项目(Regional Center Program)重新授权至2027年。因此,要彻底取消当前的EB-5项目,从法律层面来看,需要国会通过新的立法。根据美国联邦移民法和国籍法,这些法律均由国会掌控,并受《宪法》保护...
2022年3月15日,美国国会对EB-5投资移民计划进行了重大改革,推出了《2022年EB-5改革与诚信法案》(EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022,简称“RIA”)。 由于新法案旨在加强EB-5区域中心的责任和保护投资者的利益,因此对EB-5计划做出了多项改革。比如,EB-5区域中心计划延期五年至2027年9月30日,EB-5投资人...
This chapter analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of implementation of the CRA over the last 33 years and ends with some possible directions for reform. Of course' the CRA's effectiveness is a function not just of the words of the statute and regulations but also of leadership and political...
Since the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022, EB-5 visa applicants are required to invest $800,000 or $1,050,000 into a U.S. commercial enterprise. The minimum amount of capital required is $800,000 if the investment is made in a commercial entity that is located in a rural are...
It recently investigated allegations of research misconduct against a male junior faculty member pursuant to its existing "Research Integrity" policy, (which, unlike the Interim Policy, did not specify any particular sanctions for violations), and its usual Faculty Review Board procedures, a policy ...