Bottom Line: DynamoDB vs MongoDB Although DynamoDB and MongoDB are both NoSQL databases, they differ substantially. Your use case will heavily determine which one to use. First, DynamoDB has fewer available data
21. How is Amazon's NoSQL implementation different from other well-known ones like Cassandra or MongoDB? A managed NoSQL database service, DynamoDB provides quick, predictable performance with easy scalability. Several significant aspects set DynamoDB apart from other well-liked NoSQL implementations...
9/10 times I would recommend using MongoDB over DynamoDB. The only real benefit of DynamoDB over MongoDB is that it's already deeply nested in the Amazon ecosystem with tight integration with other AWS tools. Working with Amazons sdks is clunky compared to Mongo, it lacks a … Incentivize...
But CQL’s more elaborate approach comes with an advantage — reducing the number of network hops, and therefore reducing both latency and cost: In CQL, a request can often be sent on a socket directed to a specific node or even a specific CPU core that can answer it. With the DynamoD...
To avoid this problem, NoSQL databases require you to split up your data into smaller segments and perform all queries within one of these segments. This is common across all NoSQL databases. In DynamoDB and Cassandra, it's called apartition key. In MongoDB, it's called ashard key. ...