Neurocognitive Correlates of DSM-5 Antisocial Personality DisorderWall, Tina DSellbom, MartinWygant, Dustin B
This paper will describe historical perspectives for the introduction of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), criteria for the diagnosis, as well as information on epidemiology, clinical presentation and longitudi...
J. W. (2012a). Comparing symptoms of autism Spectrum disorders in a developmentally disabled adult population using the current DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria and the proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria.Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24(4), 403–414. doi:10.1007/s10882-012-927...
7189 Accesses 71 Citations 48 Altmetric 5 Mentions Explore all metrics Abstract A growing body of research has raised concerns about the number of individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) according to DSM-IV-TR who may no longer qualify for diagnoses under the new DSM-5 criter...
In summary, the first DBD group was presented inDSM-III-R(1987). There have been two DSM revisions since then (DSM-IV, DSM-IV-TR). As a group, DBD experienced multiple significant changes in DSM-IV and none in DSM-IV-TR. With the exception ofODD, significant changes for the disorder...
From the specific to the general: Using qualitative principles to assess the progress of DSM-V revisions.Smithbell, Pamela C
In 2000,DSM-IV-TR(fourth edition – text revised) was published. DSM-IV-TR has maintained the same DBD group of three disorders (ODD, CD, and DBD-NOS). The only change occurred in CD. The most recent two types from DSM-IV remained the same (CD–childhood onset and CD–adolescent on...
In 1980, DSM-III adopted a descriptive approach to psychiatric diagnosis, creating checklists of unwanted behaviors to define and use as required criteria when posing each of several hundred diagnoses. The objective of this novel approach was to validate
Criticisms of the DSMs over the past 30 years have rarely generated credible alternative classifications of psychopathology, and virtually all rivals have fallen away, as judged by clinical or research impact. This chapter considers why this has been the
(e.g., DSM-5 TR) were put in the group of the original guide (e.g., DSM-5). Pre-DSM-III was chosen when the impact of event-scale (IES) was used to measurePTS, as this was developed in 1979 (Horowitz et al., 1979), which was a year beforePTSDwas defined in the DSM-III...