There's less between you and vanilla Emacs by design. That's less to grok and less to work around when you tinker. Internals ought to be written as if reading them were part of Doom's UX, and it is! Opinionated, but not stubborn. Doom is about reasonable defaults and curated opinions...
There's less between you and vanilla Emacs by design. That's less to grok and less to work around when you tinker. Internals ought to be written as if reading them were part of Doom's UX, and it is! Opinionated, but not stubborn. Doom is about reasonable defaults and curated opinions...
There's less between you and vanilla Emacs by design. That's less to grok and less to work around when you tinker. Internals ought to be written as if reading them were part of Doom's UX, and it is! Opinionated, but not stubborn. Doom is about reasonable defaults and curated opinions...
Close to metal.There's less between you and vanilla Emacs by design. That's less to grok and less to work around when you tinker. Internals ought to be written as if reading them were part of Doom's UX, and it is! Opinionated, but not stubborn.Doom is about reasonable defaults and ...
Close to metal.There's less between you and vanilla Emacs by design. That's less to grok and less to work around when you tinker. Internals ought to be written as if reading them were part of Doom's UX, and it is! Opinionated, but not stubborn.Doom is about reasonable defaults and ...