this CRS is formally not the officialdefinition, and thus considered as ""custom"" However, for ETRS89, I believe we can safely remove it, since as faras I know, there's no better transformation between ETRS89 (which isknown modeled as a "datum ensemble" by EPSG, meaning any of the ...
I'm seeing that QGIS 3.16 / 3.22 does not recognize the CRS of specific layers generated by GeoServer, but the old QGIS 2.18.28 recognize. For instance, this shapefile:https://si.icnf.pt/shp/rnapChecking ogrinfo in different versions: ogrinfo --version GDAL 2.4.0, released 2018/12/14 ...
"Through its Value Creation Dashboard," the firm explains in its REME application, "MEB measures increases in NOI at each managed asset and converts [that to the] increase in the value of each asset." The dashboard is also the major metric of employee performance. RECOGNIZE EXCELL: THERE...
> TOWGS84[], or was it just there because that was the default one. We ere on > the side of caution (most of time, there are a few exceptions there and > there in GDAL), and keep the transformation information, which makes that > this CRS is formally not the official definition, ...
Kosovo; Latvia;Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Malta; Moldova; Monaco;Montenegro; Netherlands; North Macedonia; Norway including Svalbardand Jan Mayen; Poland; Portugal; Romania; San Marino; Serbia;Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; United Kingdom (UK)including Channel Islands and Is...