I have a Deployment which creates POD's containing two containers, each container has a named port "grpc-service" on a different port to avoid conflicts. I want a k8s service to connect to these grpc services in a round-robin fashion and also be able to use the k8s API to retrieve the...
Use a single TCP connection to reduce resource usage. Maintain an open connection over TCP to make data streaming possible. Overcome limitations with existing technologies such as: Polling: The periodic, scheduled, request cycle on the part of the client to obtain information from the server, even...
Only then will the write() indicate an issue unless TCP_USER_TIMEOUT is set on the Socket. See here for some details. So when gRPC ultimately calls write(), it also doesn't know about the disconnection. However, I see that gRPC has its own keepalive mechanism, which seems to use ...
It first performs TCP handshake with the client, acting as the application server itself, and once client data arrives it will open another TCP connection acting as a client to an available application server in the pool. For performance optimization, proxy might use an already established TCP ...
tcp 0 0 5.00.209.17:10010 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 26345/docker-contai If I run another instance of docker-containerd it says: ERRO[0000] Failed to start streaming server error="listen tcp 5.00.209.17:10010: bind: address already in use"
[xxxxxxxxxx] httpsPort: 443 tlsServerName: null useSystemRoots: true client: enabled: true image: null join: - "provider=aws tag_key=consul-datacenter tag_value=xxxxxx" grpc: true exposeGossipPorts: false resources: requests: memory: "400Mi" cpu: "200m" limits: cpu: "500m" memory: ...
10.0.0.0/17 10.1.95.206 /* linkerd/linkerd-identity:grpc cluster IP */ tcp dpt:8080 0 0 KUBE-SVC-U2TN5MI3KW4FHINL tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 10.1.95.206 /* linkerd/linkerd-identity:grpc cluster IP */ tcp dpt:8080 0 0 KUBE-MARK-MASQ tcp -- * * !10.0.0.0/17 10.1.62.130 /* ...