Delgado-Lopez v. Superintendente U.S. District Courts | Puerto Rico District Court | Prisoner | 3:22-CV-01258 | 06/03/2022 DOCKET 06/03/2022 (#3) CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. PLAINTIFF DID NOT PAY THE CORRESPONDING FILING FEE WHICH IS $402.00 FOR CIVIL RIGHT COMPLAINTS UNDER 42...
U.S. District Courts | New Jersey District Court | Other | 2:25-CV-00338 | 01/13/2025 DOCKET 01/13/2025 (#1) COMPLAINT AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS ( FILING AND ADMIN FEE $ 405 RECEIPT NUMBER ANJDC-15935627) WITH JURY DEMAND, FILED BY NORTHWEST COMMUNITY SCHOOLS. (ATTACHMENTS: #1 CIVIL...
Robertson's plea agreement could take away inherent authority of the trial court is indeed novel and, as the government states: "[N]umerous state and federal courts have concluded that counsel's failure to advance novel legal theories or arguments does not constitute ineffective performance [of ...
Sweet Grass County District Court ID is 49. The e-filing System is not yet available to self-represented litigants. Guardianship, probate, & adoption cases are not eligible for e-filing & will remain paper files at this time. E-file for attorneys only –https://courts.mt.gov/courts/...
“back-end” control by the government is particularly notable as theZafirovcase itself demonstrated an unusually high level of government involvement in the suit, with the United States objecting to dismissal under the public disclosure bar, filing numerous statements of interest, and in...
See id. at 297 ("As with all cases involving the likelihood of confusion under the Lanham Act, courts should employ all the relevant Lapp 28 In CBS, the court gave greater weight to the verbal portion of the subject mark because the evidence showed that "approximately 15% [of the product...
In both cases the district courts re... M. Gaynor,Kevin E. Pflum - ERN: Government Expenditures & Health (Topic) 被引量: 0发表: 2017年 Antitrust Alert: FTC Wins First Preliminary Injunction in Merger Case Since 2002 The article focuses on the significance of the decision of a Washington...
4 Case 1:05-cv-02562 Document 74-1 Filed 09/08/2005 Page 5 of 9 Courts will grant protective orders preventing a party from contacting the other party's customers where the harm to the party seeking protection "outweighs the importance of the information to the party seeking that ...
(which it does not), Plaintiffs could have at a minimum cited to the final e-transcripts from the Australian depositions, as the United States did.5 More to the point, Plaintiffs' counsel took the Australian depositions prior to filing their Opposition and know whether the deponents' ...
See, e.g., Guar. Tr. Co. of N.Y. v. York, 326 U.S. 99, 106 (1945) ("State law cannot define the remedies which a federal court must give simply because a federal court in diversity jurisdiction is available as an alternative tribunal to the State's courts."); Baker's...