Lilienfeld SO (2011) Distinguishing scientific from pseudoscientific psychotherapies: Evaluating the role of theoretical plausibility, with a little help from Reverend Bayes. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 18(2): 105-112.Lilienfeld SO. Distinguishing scientific from pseudoscientific psycho...
The purpose of this article is to provide some perspectives on Lilienfeld, Ammirati, and David's (2012) paper on distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology. In many respects their work represents an intervention for "grandiose bragging," a problem that has occasionally occurred wh...
The surest way to spot a fake is to know as much as possible about the real thing --in this case, about science itself. Knowing science does not mean simply knowing scientific facts (such as the distance from earth to sun, the age of the earth, the distinction between mammal and ...
The overarching aim is to assist health and exercise professionals to distinguish science from pseudoscience and make pragmatic and safe risk-to-benefit decisions.CamillaR.Illidi· LeeM.Romer· MichaelA.Johnson· NeilC.Williams· HarryB.Rossiter· RichardCasaburi·\u001FNicholasB.Tiller...
Correction to: Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in commercial respiratory interventions: an evidence-based guide for health and exercise professionalsPSEUDOSCIENCEdoi:10.1007/s00421-023-05194-4Camilla R.,IllidiLee M.,RomerMichael A.,Johnson...
Schnlau - 《Social Science Electronic Publishing》 被引量: 28发表: 2004年 Early repolarization patterns: The good, the bad, and the ugly? BACKGROUND Means for distinguishing the very common "benign early repolarization" from the very rare but malignant form are needed. Recently, the presence ....