DIBELS Next Student Materials Oral Reading Fluency / Level 6 Progress MonitoringIII, Roland H GoodKaminski, Ruth ACummings, KelliDufourmartel, ChantalPetersen, KathleenPowellsmith, KellyStollar, StephanieWallin, Joshua
Linking DIBELS® 6th Edition Oral Reading Fluency with The Lexile® Framework for ReadingK 1 2 3for Reading Measurement
Educational administration Using DIBELS next reading fluency or text reading and comprehension assessments to identify gifted students BALL STATE UNIVERSITY Joseph McKinney HeidenMark BenjaminThe purpose of this research study is to determine if the DIBELS assessments and the TRC assessments can accurately ...
At level 2, initial risk status demonstrated a significant effect on a student's initial oral reading fluency score, while the benchmark variability demonstrated a significant effect on a student's growth over time.Results demonstrate support for readability as an indicator of passage difficulty as ...
Weekly and benchmark DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency (DORF) data collected between the fall and winter benchmark period (prior to the invention) was compared to DORF data collected between the winter and spring benchmark period (during the intervention). The results of this study were inconclusive ...
Chart Two: Comparison of READING Performance Nonsense Word Fluency & Oral Reading Fluency This chart illustrates the percentage of Grade One students above the benchmark, for the subtest titled Nonsense Word Fluency who were both in the BAVX group and the control group to be at 25% in ...
The oral reading fluency test was a better predictor for students generally considered at-risk (non-white, disabled, and non-English speaking). Logistic regression results showed a moderate to strong ability to predict whether or not students would pass ISTEP based on DIBELS scores. After using ...
Oral reading fluencyThis study examined the effects of passage and presentation order on progress monitoring assessments of oral reading fluency in 134 second grade students. The students were randomly assigned to read six one-minute passages in one of six fixed orders over a seven week period. ...
A. (2012). Form effects on DIBELS Next Oral Reading Fluency progress monitoring passages. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38, 91-104.Cummings, K. D., Park, Y., & Bauer Schaper, H. A. (2012). Form effects on DIBELS next oral reading fluency progress-monitoring passages. Assessment ...
For above benchmark students (a) DORF scores predicted comprehension for high- but not low-income students; (b) statistically significant differences in reading fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary existed between high- and low-income students; (c) reading vocabulary equally predicted comprehension ...