The results of comparative analysis are shown in Fig.2. The concordance rate was 100% in HFrEF and HFmrEF for all three approaches. With respect to HFpEF, the concordance rate was 82%, 79%, and 99.5% for expert-driven, ML-driven, and hybrid CDSS, respectively. Similar findings were obse...
Participants with HFrEF trended toward higher odds of being aware of their HF diagnosis (OR 1.20 95%CI[0.73-1.98]) while less than high school education (OR 0.79 95%CI[0.39-1.61]) and living in a high poverty zip code (OR 0.57 95%CI[0.31-1.04]) were associated with a trend toward ...
The prognostic performance of galectin-3 in HFrEF and HFpEF is lower than other molecules such as NT-proBNP or sST2, and largely influenced by renal function [91]. Nonetheless, ACC/AHA guidelines recommend the dosage of galectin-3 for prognostic stratification of patients with chronic HF, with ...