Maple Essentials: Section 5: Functions: Defining, Evaluating and GraphingMike Pepe
more than ever, that belief has solidified and is fast becoming apparent. In February of 2012 I wrote: “In my opinion, the next elected President will either be George Washington or Joseph Stalin. In surveying the field of candidates at this point, I see no George...
I hope no one I see on the world stage. No person, because human nature is not trustworthy. Government was instituted to keep human nature in check. The bigger government gets, the more humans can mess it up. It becomes a god and functions like a tyrant. God, not government rights all...
When Wass de Czege describes how to approach a problem using design, for example, the term “frame” functions something like a synonym for “understanding”70—the development of the system and operating frames is the development of an understanding of the system in which the military will ...
The proofs are based on easy computer calculations with standard functions of Maple, the explicit presentation of C32 in terms of generators and relations, and methods of representation theory of the general linear group. Previous article in issue Next article in issue MSC 16R30 16S15 Keywords ...
andeasycomputercalculationswithstandardfunctionsofMaple. Introduction LetKbeanyfieldofcharacteristic0.Allvectorspaces,tensor products,algebrasconsideredinthispaperareoverK.LetX i = x (i) pq ,p,q=1,...,n,i=1,...,d,bedgenericn×nmatrices.We considerthepure(orcommutative)tracealgebraC nd generate...
Starting with the generating set given recently by Drensky and Sadikova, we have determined all relations of degree ≤ 14. For this purpose we have developed further algorithms based on representation theory of the general linear group and easy computer calculations with standard functions of Maple....
Starting with the generating set given recently by Drensky and Sadikova, we have determined all relations of degree ≤ 14. For this purpose we have developed further algorithms based on representation theory of the general linear group and easy computer calculations with standard functions of Maple....
The proofs are based on methods of representation theory of the general linear group and easy computer calculations with standard functions of Maple. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Benanti FDrensky VJournal of AlgebraF. Benanti, V. Drensky, Defining relations of minimal degree of ...
The proof is based on easy computer calculations with standard functions of Maple but the explicit form of the relation has been found with methods of representation theory of general linear groups.HelmerAslaksenandVesselinDrenskyandLiliyaSadikova...