Mark Thomas GarrettJames W. RepassGina N. Shishima
Washington — In a blockbuster decision Friday, the Supreme Court overruled a 40-year-old decision that directed federal courts to defer to agencies' interpretation of unclear laws enacted by Congress. The landmark ruling from the court, which divided 6-3 along ideological lines, curtails the ...
Today the Supreme Court upheld the Congress’s attempt to address this issue by creating, among other things, a mechanism that allows individuals to buy health insurance for themselves and their families at something other than the extortionate rates they’re subject to now. As Andy ...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision allowing regional interstate banks has done away with one restriction in America’ s banking operation, although many others still remain. Although the ruling does not apply to very large money - center banks, it is a move in a liberalizing direction that co...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision allowing regional interstate banks has done away with one restriction in America’ s banking operation, although many others still remain. Although the ruling does not apply to very large money - center banks, it is a move in a liberalizing direction that co...
In response to the Supreme Court's ruling, U.S. President Joe Biden said Friday that the court "expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized," calling it "a sad day for the Court and for the country." ...
第一段指出,最高法院 (the Supreme Court)最近一项裁决使地区性州际银行(regional interstate bank)在美国银行业务中摆脱了一项限制,虽然许多限制尚存。这项裁决(ruling)并不适用于金融中心银行,但是,它标志着向放宽的方向迈进了一步,放宽最终会使国会制定(framing)一个合理的法律法规制度,对银行的未来发展做出规划,...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision allowing regional interstate banks has done away with one restriction in America’ s banking operation, although many others still remain. Although the ruling does not apply to very large money - center banks, it is a move in a liberalizing direction that co...
Does the president -- is he immune from a criminal trial for things he did as president?Not while president. As president.The answer to me would be, yes. No trial for -- because that should have been stopped by Congress. Or the Supreme Court. Or whatever.As an official act, there ...
seniority system]]>LIANE HANSEN