Systematic review methodsData extraction forms link systematic reviews with primary research and provide the foundation for appraising, analysing, summarising and interpreting a body of evidence. This makes thei
Extracting data from publication reports is a standard process in systematic review (SR) development. However, the data extraction process still relies too much on manual effort which is slow, costly, and subject to human error. In this study, we developed a text summarization system aimed at ...
Finally, it should be noted that the process of data acquisition and cleansing is not static, but involves feedback from the feature extraction and feature comparison steps. Show moreView chapter Reference work 2001, Encyclopedia of VibrationS. Doebling, C. Farrar Related terms: Energy Engineering...
Automation of the parts of systematic review process, specifically the data extraction step, may be an important strategy to reduce the time necessary to complete a systematic review. However, the state of the science of automatically extracting data elements from full texts has not been well descr...
Data extraction (DE) is a challenging step in systematic reviews (SRs). Complex SRs can involve multiple interventions and/or outcomes and encompass multiple research questions. Attempts have been made to clarify DE aspects focusing on the subsequent met
which is 56% of the total number of selected literature. Table3obtained from the data extraction process of the 32 papers shows the different existing methods to quantify or detect sensor data errors (RQ2), along with the errors addressed, the respective papers that presented the method and th...
This Tutorial on Data Mining Process Covers Data Mining Models, Steps and Challenges Involved in the Data Extraction Process.
Data extraction and synthesis This review utilised the seven-phase guidance provided by Noblit and Hare [63] for conducting a meta-synthesis which was further refined by Walsh and Downe [64]. Studies which met inclusion criteria were read in full and their results and discussion sections were ex...
Any discrepancies arising from this process were subject to discussion and resolution among the remaining review team members (DY, GP and EP). 2.5. Data extraction SM undertook data extraction using an Excel spreadsheet form. The form underwent piloting and refinement in consultation with team ...
Ideally, the entire study selection and data extraction process should have been performed by at least two reviewers. Another limitation is that we defined an analytical framework to synthesize retrieved data in advance. However, the analytical framework was based on the previous systematic review of...