J. Bar-IlanBar-Ilan, J. (2002). Criteria for evaluating information retrieval systems in highly dynamic environments. Proceedings of the international world wide web conference , Honolulu, HI (pp. 70–77).
Common Criteria (CC) is an international standard (ISO/IEC 15408) for evaluating information technology security products. It provides guidelines and specifications to ensure that these products meetrecognized security standards, especially for government and other high-security environments. Established i...
aThe main criteria for evaluating securities are corporate profits.But does the information provided by a firm facilitate the ability to predict profitability and how reliable is the information that is presented to investors? An import ant point highlighted by Guan et a1.(2006) is that the flexi...
Dillon has offered a broad definition that attempts to accommodate the diversity of approaches. Dillon defines IA as “the process of designing, implementing, and evaluating information spaces that are humanly and socially acceptable to their intended stakeholders” [8]. This is an inclusive definition...
The study aims to establishing a model for evaluating information sources available on the internet, which could be used be researchers to judge the source prior use for research and scholarly purposes, so as to help researchers to reach information with the topmost level of quality and ...
Framework for evaluating information security 201 Figure 3 New foundation for information security (reproduced from Parker D. (1995), A new framework for information security to avoid information anarchy, in Proceedings ofthe IFIP!Sec '95, 1995.) Step3 In this step, the preferred functional ...
The proposed matrix may be useful both for defining the necessary components of good theory and for evaluating and/or comparing the quality of alternative theories. Finally, a discussion of the way theories fit together to give a somewhat broader picture of empirical reality reveals the lines of ...
Marsh HW, Jayasinghe UW, Bond NW (2008) Improving the peer-review process for grant applications. Am Psychologist 63(3):160–168 ArticleGoogle Scholar Mårtensson P, Fors U, Wallin SB, Zander U, Nilsson GH (2016) Evaluating research: a multidisciplinary approach to assessing research practice...
3. Criteria for evaluating adaptation The results offer a concise yet comprehensive, interdisciplinary, flexible, and forward-looking set of 16 criteria organized into four overarching categories: (1) use of information, (2) project management, (3) ecological and social outcomes, and (4) advancing...
Systematic planning for digital preservation: evaluating potential strategies and building preservation plans The Open Archival Information Systems (OAIS) model and corresponding criteria catalogues for trustworthy repositories specify requirements that such a process ... C Becker,H Kulovits,M Guttenbrunner,...