If you sign up for this course, you are entitled to all live classes plus one year of self-paced course access. All materials are included. A certificate of attendance is provided at the end of the course.MORE INFO AND REGISTRATION AT https://court-interpreting-training-online-cito-course....
The court held that the district court erred in certifying the denial of benefits classes without limiting them to those whose claims were denied based on the applicable challenged portions of the guidelines. Such certification violated the Rules Enabling Act, which p...
was the seventh chief justice of the United States (1874–88), who frequently spoke for the Supreme Court in interpreting the post-Civil War constitutional amendments and in redefining governmental jurisdiction over commerce in view of the great expansion of American business. Reacting against the ...
The opinions of the United States Supreme Court, although not binding on this court in interpreting the separation of powers principles of the California Constitution, supply a persuasive body of case authority. Just as our state Constitution provides for the separation of the powers of government i...
The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial body in the country. It serves as the final authority for interpreting the Indian Constitution. The SC judges are appointed by the President of India.
Part I discusses the three cases directly interpreting Rule 23. Part II addresses the three decisions involving securities classes brought under Rule 10b-5. Part III discusses the three decisions involving the Federal Arbitration Act. Part IV engages the two decisions addressing the non-party status...
And as if the point was not clear enough, the Supreme Court stated “interpreting the word ‘law’ to include rules and regulations could defeat the purpose of the whistleblower statute. That interpretation would allow an agency to insulate itself… simply by promulgating a regulation that ‘...
Supporting the principle of liberal construction of private deed restrictions to promote the free use of land does not require, nor in my opinion sanction, interpreting "single family dwelling" to include the boarding house arrangement for profit in this case. To do so is to ignore the restricti...
the Court ignores both the language of § 1983 and the case law interpreting that language. Section 1983 provides a cause of action where a person acting under color of state law "subjects, or causes to be subjected," any other person to a deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution ...
“separate but equal” educational facilities were unconstitutional. InLaua federal district court in 1973 ruled in favour of the SFUSD. InterpretingBrownasmandatingthe provision of education on equal terms, the district court concluded that the board did not violate the equal protection clause, ...