"President Trump can go ask Congress to give him amnesty by a two-thirds vote but, unless he does that, our Constitution protects us from insurrectionists," he continued."This case illustrates the danger of refusing to apply Section 3 as written because the reason we're here i...
The Supreme Court has begun hearing three combined court cases — two issued by congressional committees and one by a New York grand jury — demanding access to President Donald Trump’s long-withheld tax returns and financial records. The highly-anticipated meta-case calls into question the ...
Trump decided not to appear in person for the Supreme Court’s hearing today, unlike some of his other criminal and civil cases where Trump has appeared in person with the belief that he is his own best line of defense and that it helps him politically. Trump’s legal problems have proven...
Trump also complained about the case potentially lasting another two to three weeks, as has been expected, calling it “election interference.” “This case should be over. This case should have never been brought,” he said. “I thought they were finished today,” he said, charging “they...
Former President Donald Trump appears at the DC circuit appeals court to watch his attorneys argue that he has absolute immunity in the Jan. 6 case. January 9, 2024 Additional Live Streams Live ABC News Live Live Former President Carter lies in repose at the Carter Center in Atlanta Live Maj...
Colorado’s Supreme Court, in a first-of-its-kind ruling, had decided that the provision, Section 3, could be applied to Trump, who that court found incited the Capitol attack. No court before had applied Section 3 to a presidential candidate. What to know about Trump’s hush ...
Live from Mar-a-Lago, Trump was televised for an audience of one: the judge in his criminal case.
Trump, who is speaking to reporters on today’s proceedings, called the Supreme Court argument “a beautiful thing to watch in many respects,” even as he complained about the case being brought in the first place. “I hope that democracy in this country will continue,” he told reporters ...
The opinion wasPer Curiam-- that is, it was an unsigned decision, and the Supreme Court did not release the breakdown of the justices' votes. But because there were also no dissents on the question of hearing arguments in the travel ban case, it's assumed that that the decision to take...
and in the weeks leading up to it. By deciding even to hear Trump’s preposterous assertion that he is above the law, the court signaled thatit would bend over backwardto accommodate Trump and thus, his re-election. The justices reinforced that message byscheduling the hearing on ...