Supreme Court hears freedom of speech cases on social media platforms ABC News’ Devin Dwyer reports as the Supreme Court hears the first amendment cases on whether the White House violated freedom of speech by requesting social media platforms to remove misinformation....
At the core of both cases is so-called jawboning, or informal pressure by the government on an intermediary to take certain actions that will suppress speech. In the first dispute, the intermediaries are the platforms, and in the second case, the intermediaries are insurance companies. ...
From the perspective of Free Speech Yearbook readers, the 2000-2001 term was an extraordinarily busy one. This essay offers extended discussions of ten court cases that dealt explicitly with the kinds of issues that define the Yearbook's scope-everything from public forum analysis and regulation...
FREEDOM OF SPEECH BIBLIOGRAPHY July 1982—June 1983 ARTICLES, BOOKS, NEWSLETTERS, SUPREME COURT CASESA bibliography on the subject of freedom of speech is presented which includes the article "Formative period of first amendment theory, 1870-195," by A. J. Anderson, the book ""The Media ...
e Court's agenda]]>MARK SHERMAN
"Freedom of speech is under attack in Texas,"Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott said when he signed the bill into law in 2021. "There is a dangerous movement by some social media companies to silence conservative ideas and values. This is wrong and we will not allow it in Texas." ...
The case is believed to be the first time that the Court of Appeal will consider a Christian freedom of speech employment case. Mr Page was suspended from the magistracy and forced out of a role at an NHS Trust after explaining on television th...
regulatorviolated the National Rifle Association's free speech rightswhen she pressured banks and insurance companies in the state to sever ties with the gun rights group after the 2018 shooting in Parkland, Florida. Decisions from the Supreme Court in both cases are expected by the end of June...
The articles on the national court website justify the joint interpretation (and could not do otherwise), including one stating that “freedom of speech” and criminal punishment of false rumors is not contradictory. It would appear (from the posting of the comments of the responsible person on...
FREEDOM OF SPEECH BIBLIOGRAPHY: JULY 1980—JUNE 1981 ARTICLES, BOOKS, NEWSLETTERS, COURT CASESdoi:10.1080/08997225.1981.10556015DavidCentralMissouriEshelmanCentralMissouriInformaworldFree Speech Yearbook