Our goal is to find additional coun- terexamples in the shaded region. As new counterexamples are dis- covered in the shaded region (and generalized), the counterexample space becomes covered until no more classes of counterexamples exist or it becomes too difficult for the testing framework to ...
INT vs. CTR+D: Our counterexample showed an error of 0.0725 and a percentage relative error of 21.83%.This is respectively 363 and 546 times higher than the worst case obtained in the examples.Conclusions: NT and INT methods are not necessarily good approximations to the CTR+D method.Omar...
Recommended Lessons and Courses for You Related Lessons Related Courses Deductive Reasoning Lesson for Kids Common Patterns of Deductive Reasoning Valid Arguments in Deductive Logic | Definition & Examples Law of Contrapositive | Definition & Examples ...
Video: Valid Arguments in Deductive Logic | Definition & Examples Video: Law of Contrapositive | Definition & Examples Video: Syllogism Definition, Types & Examples Video: Appeal to Ignorance Fallacy Video: Equivocation Fallacy | Definition & Examples Video: Naturalistic Fallacy | Definition...