至此,我们介绍完了MySQL数据库对于COUNT(*)的优化,这些优化的前提都是查询语句中不包含WHERE以及GROUP BY条件。 COUNT(1) InnoDB handles SELECT COUNT(*) and SELECT COUNT(1) operations in the same way. There is no performance difference. 所以,对于COUNT(1)和COUNT(*),MySQL的优化是完全一样的,根本不...
create a counter table and let your application update it according to the inserts and deletes it does. However, this method may not scale well in situations where thousands of concurrent transactions are initiating updates to the same counter table. If ...
前言 相信大多数DBA都看见过这样一条SQL优化原则:用count(1)替换count(*);相信也有不少DBA因这个问题被开发diss过,用count(*)非常慢,应该用count(1),然后改用count(1)后,还真是秒出结果;那么究竟是什么回事呢?count(1)真的比count(*)快那么多吗?count(1)和count(*)的区别究竟在哪里?接下来我们就来一...
所以,count(*) 执行过程跟 count(1) 执行过程基本一样的,性能没有什么差异。 在MySQL 5.7 的官方手册中有这么一句话: InnoDB handles SELECT COUNT(\*) and SELECT COUNT(1) operations in the same way. There is no performance difference. 翻译:InnoDB以...
count(1)和count(*)取舍 之前也不知道在哪看到的或听说的,count(1) 比count(*) 效率高,这是错误的认知,官网上有这么一句话,InnoDB handles SELECT COUNT( *) and SELECT COUNT(1) operations in the same way. There is no performance difference. 翻译过来就是,InnoDB以同样的方式处理SELECT COUNT( *)和...
一、前言 当我们对一张数据表中的记录进行统计的时候,习惯都会使用count函数来统计,但是count函数传入的参数有很多种,比如count(1)、count(*)、count...
InnoDB handles SELECT COUNT(*) and SELECT COUNT(1) operations in the same way. There is no performance difference. 画重点:same way,no performance difference。所以,对于COUNT(1)和COUNT(*),MySQL的优化是完全一样的,根本不存在谁比谁快!
count(1)和count(*)取舍 之前也不知道在哪看到的或听说的,count(1) 比count(*) 效率高,这是错误的认知,官网上有这么一句话,InnoDB handles SELECT COUNT( *) and SELECT COUNT(1) operations in the same way. There is no performance difference. 翻译过来就是,InnoDB以同样的方式处理SELECT COUNT( *)和...
count(1)和count(*)取舍 之前也不知道在哪看到的或听说的,count(1) 比count(*) 效率高,这是错误的认知,官网上有这么一句话,InnoDB handles SELECT COUNT( *) and SELECT COUNT(1) operations in the same way. There is no performance difference. ...
count(1)和count(*)取舍 之前也不知道在哪看到的或听说的,count(1) 比count(*) 效率高,这是错误的认知,官网上有这么一句话,InnoDB handles SELECT COUNT( *) and SELECT COUNT(1) operations in the same way. There is no performance difference. ...