nas 分享4417 amd吧 ningmengshu 最终版i7-1165G7最新跑分曝光:单核性能比锐龙7 4800U高出24%日前,Core i7-1165G7现身Passmark,最终成绩得到曝光。规格方面,这颗CPU 4核8线程,2.8/4.7GHz频率。虽然在总GB5成绩上不如锐龙7 4800U(落后31%),可单核拿到3273分,比4800U高出24.4%。锐龙7 4800U是一颗8核16...
U系列的主打产品是八核,16线程的Ryzen 7 5800U,其1.9GHz时钟速度可以提升到4.4 GHz。AMD称该芯片提供“超薄笔记本电脑中最快的生产率”。根据该公司的基准测试,该芯片在PCMark 10上的性能比英特尔酷睿i7-1165G7高出1.23倍,并且在包括Excel和Edge在内的许多办公应用程序的子测试中均击败了它(尽管这两款芯片在P...
10812 Intel Core i7-9750H 这个评分测试通过使用多线程来评估中央处理器(CPU)的性能。 中央处理器数量 低中高 Top 100%882 中央处理器178 - 12970 Loading... PassMark测试结果:您认为重要吗? 有无 报告一个错误 关闭vs选择了2个项目 Intel Core i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-9750H 比较+ ...
为什么Intel Core i7-1165G7优于Intel Core i7-1160G7? 33.33%快的 CPU 速度 ? 4 x 2.8 GHzvs4 x 2.1 GHz PassMark测试结果高10.86% ? 10178vs9181 涡轮时钟速度快0.3GHz ? 4.7GHzvs4.4GHz 最大存储器容量大32GB ? 64GBvs32GB 图形处理器(GPU)加速度快200 MHz ...
the 6C and 8C Ryzen 5000 U processors run circles around the i7-1165G7 even in more power-efficient packages, and we would have gotten the same results if LG would have implemented AMD hardware on this Gram 16 series. That’s not an option for now, but hopefully will be with the fu...
Luxmark 3.1 – Luxball HDR – OpenCL CPUs + GPUs score:CPU not properly recognized; These results are within 10% of the Intel i7-1185G7 reference configuration that has been provided by Intel for the initial Tiger Lake performance previews, so I wouldn’t expect major differences with the...
10178 Intel Core i7-1165G7 这个评分测试通过使用多线程来评估中央处理器(CPU)的性能。 中央处理器数量 低中高 Top 100%885 中央处理器178 - 12963 Loading... PassMark测试结果:您认为重要吗? 有无 报告一个错误 关闭vs选择了2个项目 Intel Core i5-1135G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7 比较+ ...
PassMark测试结果高1.56x ? 10178vs6519 涡轮时钟速度快1.2GHz ? 4.7GHzvs3.5GHz 第二层快取存储器大4 MB ? 5 MBvs1 MB 向下滚动,浏览更多细节 为什么Intel Core i7-6700HQ优于Intel Core i7-1165G7? 总线传输速率快4 GT/s ? 8 GT/svs4 GT/s ...
Luxmark 3.1 – Luxball HDR – OpenCL CPUs + GPUs score:CPU not properly recognized; These results are within 5-15% of the same Intel i7-1165G7 tested on the ZenBook UX393, which runs at higher-power. That’s actually surprising, as I was expecting poorer scores given the power differ...
PassMark:Rating: 4655, CPU mark: 10919, 3D Graphics Mark: 6002; GeekBench 4.4.2 64-bit:Single-Core: 5358, Multi-core: 16920; GeekBench 5.0.1 64-bit:Single-Core: 1228, Multi-core: 4000; CineBench R15 (best run):CPU 736 cb, CPU Single Core 180 cb; ...