The court emphasized the need to clarify the AI technology used to protect the public's right to know. The plaintiff sought compensation and an apology from the defendant, who used the image without permission and removed watermarks. The court found the defendant liable for infringement an...
In general, you may use outputs from generative AI features commercially. However, if Adobe designates in the product or elsewhere that a beta version of a generative AI feature cannot be used commercially, then the generated outputs from that beta feature are for personal use only a...
Recently, a Beijing court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in the first case in China involving copyright protection for AI-generated images. The judge said when using generative artificial intelligence to create images, if they can reflect the human originality and intellectual input, they should b...
The agency used its initiative to propose new federal laws regulating the creation, reproduction and distribution of digital replicas. This move is unsurprising, given it has previously denied or overturned copyright applications for AI-generated images. Marketers may be surprised to learn they cannot...
2023年2月,版权局做出结论,包含人类创作文本结合AI绘画程序Midjourney生成图像的漫画小说构成受版权保护的作品,但单个图像本身不受版权法保护。More recently, the Office reviewed a registration for a work containing human-authored elements combined with AI-generated images. In February 2023, the Office ...
Images created by Li using Stable Diffusion Moreover, the Beijing Internet Court declared that “when people use AI models to generate images, fundamentally, it is still humans using a tool for creation.” In other words, the court found that “the intellectual input throughout the enti...
Adobe does cover commercial use of AI generated images in their terms of use. But that covers the perspective of is Adobe saying it is ok for you to use an image their tools created or altered. It does not address the question of are there any legal issues with your own use ...
本期主要内容: Felix and Mihir discuss how copyright applies to Al-generated works. Are Al companies guilty of mass infringement? Could users be sued if they use Al to generate texts and images? Wouldn't it be right to compensate authors for their contributions to AI models? Plus, a decade...
In layman’s terms, an AI just does not create content as a human would, nor with the originality of one, and therefore generated works are not copyright-worthy. “Based on the record before it, the Office concludes that the images generated by Midjourney contained within the Work...
Author Kris Kashtanova hit the headlines last year by publicly claiming to be the first artist to receive copyright for an AI-generated work. The author sought protection and registration of her comic book “Zarya of the Dawn”[6]. The book incorporated images created using an AI generator ...