Chinese Court Upholds Copyright for AI-Generated Art in Landmark Ruling A Suzhou court ruled that AI-generated artwork with human creativity qualifies forcopyright protection. Plaintiff Lin adjusted prompts and edited AI images usingPhotoshop, creating a unique heart design. The court ordered a real ...
The court emphasized the need to clarify the AI technology used to protect the public's right to know. The plaintiff sought compensation and an apology from the defendant, who used the image without permission and removed watermarks. The court found the defendant liable for infringement and ...
A Suzhou court ruled that AI-generated artwork with human creativity qualifies forcopyright protection. Plaintiff Lin adjusted prompts and edited AI images usingPhotoshop, creating a unique heart design. The court ordered a real estate firm to pay￥10,000 for unauthorized use, echoing a 2023 Beijin...
Recently, a Beijing court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in the first case in China involving copyright protection for AI-generated images. The judge said when using generative artificial intelligence to create images, if they can reflect the human originality and intellectual input, they should b...
The challenge that Sahni faced was that, given the way RAGHAV operates and the nature of the output (which relied heavily on the AI-generated components of the image), it was not possible for him to merely disclaim the AI-generated components. ...
In general, you may use outputs from generative AI features commercially. However, if Adobe designates in the product or elsewhere that a beta version of a generative AI feature cannot be used commercially, then the generated outputs from that beta feature are for personal use only ...
For any Adobe AI-generated images, how is Adobe ensuring that the image components have free and clear intellectual property? Are the image elements coming from Adobe Stock? If we haven't licensed Adobe Stock, but do have licenses for Illustrator, InDesign, Photo...
concerns for users of AI text-to-image generators when there is a growing backlash from artists and media organisations. If the data used to train certain AI models is found to have been used unlawfully, this may create further uncertainties about the legal status of the generated images. ...
The use of AI as a tool to enhance the human creative process (e.g., for ideation or to edit an image) does not render the entire work uncopyrightable. Background In March 2023, the USCO issuedguidance on works containing material generated by AI, confirming its position that human authors...
Images created by Li using Stable Diffusion Moreover, the Beijing Internet Court declared that “when people use AI models to generate images, fundamentally, it is still humans using a tool for creation.” In other words, the court found that “the intellectual input throughout the en...