Supreme Court to hear arguments over contraception mandateJennifer WebbManaged Healthcare Executive
For one thing, the Supreme Court "knocked out" the administration's leading arguments for why the contraception rule is not a "substantial burden" on religious entities, Walsh noted. If there is a substantial burden, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) dictates that the government must ...
the Supreme Court on Monday ruled that the Obama administration must exempt closely-held firms like Hobby Lobby from a rule requiring large companies to help pay for their employees' birth control.
JMP: So, big day at the Supreme Court. Oral arguments for Hobby Lobby and the Conestoga Wood Specialty cases, and apparently there’s confusion out there about what are the issues before the court and what’s at stake. So this seems like a perfect opportunity for you and I to break thi...
摘要: The article reports on the oral arguments heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on March 25, 2014 on the case Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby that challenged a provision of the Affordable Care Act where insurance policies are required to cover birth control....
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in two cases, Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius.These cases, which arise from an Affordable Care Act mandate, will have a critical impact on women's health. At issue is whether a for-profit ...
Supreme Court heard arguments on the issue of whether companies, on the basis of religious beliefs, can object to a U.S. Affordable Care Act provision requiring employers to provide contraceptive coverage in their employee health insurance plans...
The craft store chain is fighting Obamacare's contraception mandate, taking its argument to the Supreme Court, which heard arguments last week and is expected to rule by June. But Hobby Lobby's right hand apparently doesn't know what its left hand is doing, at least when it comes to the...