CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation Ramakrishna Vedantam Virginia Tech vrama91@vt.edu C. Lawrence Zitnick Microsoft Research larryz@microsoft Devi Parikh Virgnia Tech parikh@vt.edu Abstract Automatically describing an image with a sentence is a long-standing challenge in computer vision...
CIDEr: [CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation] (http://arxiv.org/pdf/1411.5726.pdf) Developers Ramakrishna Vedantam (Virgina Tech) Acknowledgments MS COCO Caption Evaluation Team Releases No releases published Packages No packages published ...
CIDEr: [CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation] (http://arxiv.org/pdf/1411.5726.pdf) Developers Ramakrishna Vedantam (Virgina Tech) Acknowledgments MS COCO Caption Evaluation Team Packages No packages published Languages OpenEdge ABL100.0%...
CIDEr-R: Robust Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation.Gabriel Oliveira dos SantosEsther Luna ColombiniSandra AvilaAssociation for Computational LinguisticsProceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT 2021)
was convened to provide guidance on the optimal use of pegvaliase to improve the long-term outcomes for adults with PKU. This paper summarizes these evidence- and consensus-based recommendations and has been evaluated against the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) Inst...
The consensus-based PARRQA framework fills a gap in the literature by offering criteria to ensure rigorous planning, conduct, and evaluation of rapid qualitative projects. The PARRQA framework provides an expert-guided resource to support high-level methodological rigor in real-world qualitative ...
Collaborative Planning-Support System: An Approach for Determining Evaluation Criteria. J. Hydrol. 1996, 177, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Bender, M.J.; Simonovic, S.P. A System Approach for Collaborative Decision Support in Water Resources Planning. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2000, ...
Moreover, 𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑠𝑡fbest is the objective function evaluation at the final generation. Table 1 also shows the objective function evaluation at the final generation called 𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑠𝑡fbest. The performance of MMDE is similar in both tests. After a total of 150 generations, ...
An accurate description of soft tissue and chest wall morphological abnormalities, not always easy to identify during clinical assessment, is of outstanding importance since to different types of malformation correspond a different therapeutic approach. Evaluation by US is therefore recommended (Table 3) ...
A systematic review of the EQUATOR database indicated a similar result and added that among the reporting guidelines that mentioned the Delphi method, the description of details of the participants, number of rounds, criteria for dropping items or stopping the rounds was not always reproducible [48...