The present case study aims to compare collaborative writing activities produced on the Padlet website on the internet and in a face-to-face (F2F) environment. This study for which criterion sampling was used included two different groups, both of which were formed wit...
Finally, collaborative writing and Web 2.0 work together seamlessly. Collaborating students need not be in the same room, or even the same school/city/state/country. And their work, usually password-protected, may be accessed from any Internet-enabled computer. So a student, or team of students...
According to Wikipedia, the term collaborative writing refers to projects where written works are created by multiple people together (collaboratively) rather than individually. Some projects are overseen by an editor or editorial team, but many grow without any top-down oversight (Wikipedia, 2007)....
A Comparison of Writing Instruction Using Word Processing, Word Processing with Voice Synthesis, and No Word Processing in Kindergarten and First Grade very young children can benefit from instruction using word processors and voice synthesizers and that using these devices seemed to foster collaborative...
Comparing software artifacts to identify their similarities and differences is a task ubiquitous in software engineering. Logical-design comparison is part... T Tudorache,C Nyulas,NF Noy,... - Springer Berlin Heidelberg 被引量: 169发表: 2013年 Integrated collaborative user interface for a document...
These can range from dropping markers along a path, to placing directional signs, to putting graffiti on objects to mark one’s presence, to writing a message on a virtual paper, to leaving a visual annotation. Other participants who encounter the mark later may subsequently find that ...
Also, perhaps the model group declined their motivation due to the time gap between the comparison and the writing of the second draft. A week might be too long and students might feel unable to remember the features they noticed from the models (Luquin Urtasun & García Mayo, 2021). ...
However, the dyads showed no significant improvement in their writing performance from the immediate posttest (M = 25.11) to the delayed posttest (M = 24.65) (Mean Difference = 0.170, p = 0.949).Table 7 Post-hoc multiple comparison: pretest, the immediate and delayed post...
Statistical analysis was performed using Minitab 18 software (Minitab). Comparison between positive control and their negative isotype control was performed using linear mixed effect model with log10 (pg/ml) transformed data. Mean results were calculated for each response and treatment method. Analysis...
Martin Stancek: Software (collaboration in VRsketch), Data curation, Writing – original draft, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. Ivan Polasek: Conceptualization (concept of VRsketch, tracking), Methodology, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Wri...