Supreme Court has agreed to review a case that is likely to have major repercussions on national air pollution policy. The case involves part of the Clean Air Act called new source review. The said provision requires companies, including chemical manufacturers, to install up-to-date pollution ...
clean air actdynamic statutory interpretationtextualismpurosivismjudicial ideologyattitudinal modelideological decisionmakinglaw and economicsWhile public and scholarly concern about ideological decision making in Supreme Court cases has traditionally focused on abortion rights and other constitutionaDriesen, ...
Climate ChangePreemptionClean Air ActOn June 20, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the closely watched case of American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut, 131 S. Ct. 2527 (2011) (AEP), in whichMay, JamesSocial Science Electronic Publishing...
Kevin Minoli comments on how the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in <em>West Virginia v. EPA</em> could be blunted by a review of EPA strategy.
Ahlers wrote articles about two important Clean Air Act cases that are included in the law school’s2013 Top Ten Watchlistof key environmental law cases. The cases areCoalition for Responsible Regulation v. E.P.A.andEME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. E.P.A., both decided by the U.S...
formulation. In recent years, the Court's decisions in environmental cases involving statutory interpretation, from the scope of Superfund's contribution right to the meaning of "navigable waters" under the Clean Water Act, have increasingly rested on the side of the plain meaning of the statute....
If I remember correctly, the Federal Courts rejected the Trump rule that limited the application of the Clean Water Act to a number of waterways. LeRoy C. Paddock: I believe that’s right, there are multiple rules at play and multiple cases in the Supreme Court. I think the ...
Clean Power Plan Tag:Clean Power Plan Supreme Court Limits EPA’s Authority under the Clean Air Act Margaret Anne Hill,Frank L. Tamulonis III, andStephen C. Zumbrun● After seven years, three presidential administrations, and two appearances before the Supreme Court, the Obama Administration’s ...
The Supreme Court ruled that the EPA has the authority to regulate GHG emissions under the Clean Air Act and caused the state of Massachusetts harm by not doing so. The decision potentially gives states fighting for GHG regulations new power over the agency. California, which proposed stricter ...
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and an Unbridled Spending Power: Will They Survive on the Supreme Court's Road to Substantive Federalism 来自 Semantic Scholar 喜欢 0 阅读量: 19 作者: Mark A. Miller 摘要: The question remains as to how far the Supreme Court will go in its re...