Searching for an attorney has never been easier Enter information in at least one field (required) Legal Issue Use up and down arrow keys to navigate. Touch device users, explore by touch or with swipe gestures. Location Use up and down arrow keys to navigate. Touch device users, explore ...
the Montana Consumer Protection Act, and breach of warranties. North Idaho Insulation then filed a third-party complaint against Southwest Distributing Co. (Southwest), alleging that Southwest manufactured and sold the defective spray foam insulation and seeking indemnification and contribution.The Montana...
Under federal environmental protection law, the federal government has created a cause of action for a property owner to sue a "potentially responsible party" (PRP) who was a prior owner of the land and did not remedy a environmental hazard before selling the property. Federal law leaves it ...
May 19, 1942 Executive Order 9165 established Facility Security Division for protection of essential facilities from sabotage and other destructive acts, and placed responsibility for facility security program upon OCD. May 28, 1942 War Emergency Radio Service (WEBS) authorized by Defense Communications ...
Again to support the CIA, our panel laid the groundwork for the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act that prevented identification of CIA operatives. This was the act that now appears to have been violated by at least half of the Bush White House in its demented efforts to punish Ambass...
Yes, the Civil War brought an end to the slave order of the South and the rule of the plantation oligarchs who embodied white supremacy. But the Northern victory was short lived -- Southern ideals spread quickly to the West. It's all about America’s ong
Of the 13 states with sodomy laws, four -- Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma and Missouri -- prohibit oral and anal sex between same-sex couples. The other nine ban consensual sodomy for everyone: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia. ...
And of course under this view of the equal protection clause there is no shield whatsoever against sexual orientation discrimination. Justice Scalia is willing to bend his interpretive rules a bit, which is why he says he’s not a “nut.” He recognizes respect for some earlier Court ...
, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, . Plaintiff, . CiviL Action No. 75-1725 , V. AMERICAN BRANDS, INC., . Defendant. . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x CERTIFICATE ...
The reasoning set forth by the Court—that this federal law “violate[d] basic due process and equal protection principles applicable to the Federal Government”—suggested that state laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples would fall too ([32], p. 2693). At the same time, the Court...