Civil Court Congestion in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los AngelesNix, Lloyd SGeo.l.j
Civil cases refer to legal disputes between two or more parties stemming from non-criminal matters, such as contract or property disputes, personal injury claims, or family law matters like divorce and child custody.
In Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, which established a formula for Congress to use when determining if a state or voting jurisdiction requires prior approval before changing its voting laws. Under Section 5 of the act, nine—mostly S...
Renowned trial attorney and broadcast legal analyst, Brian Claypool is California's preeminent child abuse and civil rights litigator. Free consultation!
CM/ECF - California Central District Page 1 of 9 (RCx), DISCOVERY, MANADR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:10-cv-05830-MMM -RC AFMS LLC v. United Parcel Service Co. et al Assigned to: Judge ...
In 1968, Corona began a La Hermandad branch in Los Angeles to do informational outreach, educating undocumented people about their legal rights. Under Corona, La Hermandad's operation also spun off what was called 23 "At one point the INS was raiding agricultural fields in the southwestern ...
Los Angeles, because of her politics and her association with communists. At about the same time, Davis became involved in the case of three African American inmates at Soledad Prison who had been accused of murdering a guard. She became deeply involved with one of the inmates, George ...
Grace Jabbari, a 31-year-old British dancer, filed the action in federal court in Manhattan, claiming Majors subjected her to escalating incidents of physical and verbal abuse from 2021 to 2023. "Grace Jabbari's resolve has never wavered," her lawyer, Brittany Henderson, said in an email ...
Angela Reddock-Wright, an employment and Title IX attorney and mediator based in Los Angeles, believes it is “very possible” that the case could end up at the Supreme Court. “Ideally, the court would decline to hear this matter on the grounds that Section 1981 was not in...
The federal government responded to the Jim Crow laws with the Fourteenth Amendment, which would have banned all forms of prejudicial discrimination if the Supreme Court had actually enforced it. However, in the midst of these discriminatory laws, practices, and traditions, the U.S. Supreme Cour...