But, theCambridge Fivewere still active as NATO was created – as were various spy networks in the US State Department…and it isn’t like even to this day we’ve uncovered everyone who was working for the USSR at the time. Interesting thing to look into, but it need not detain us he...
policies coordinated with those of allies, including European countries in NATO, Japan, South Korea, Philippines, and Australia? Part II: Highlights of Key Statements by Washington, Beijing, and Taipei In Part II below, this CRS Report provides excerpts from key statements on "one China" as ...
(3.) On the level of unified thinking, eliminate fear of America.Surveying US-Russian relations one can see that America respects strength. Russia halted the US [Cold War] strategic attack in Southeast Asia, and stopped the expansion of NATO beyond Ukraine and Georgia. We cannot say that [...
Beijing's readout of the call did not suggest any Chinese role in ending the war. It quoted Xi as referring to a favourite aphorism, "Let he who tied the bell on the tiger's neck take it off", a seeming reference to China's position that the US and NATO Beijing blames the war on...
Washington had been urging China since the beginning of Russia’s war to play some role in peace negotiations, and now it has offered to do so, outlining the basic principles. I think that’s a good thing. The U.S. cannot be an honest broker, nor can any country in NATO. Perhaps Ch...
Who’s scared of China? - By Premen Addy US vs. China: a dangerous phase has begun - China is a formidable adversary whose ultimate strength is not its military hardware but its economic prowess, and whose diplomatic weapon is not saber rattling but great patience. (link to the Christian...
Longstanding geopolitical rivalries and the more recent, anti-Russian sanctions of the US and other NATO countries hamper international collaborations and critically, funding. Second, the militarization of science and sensitive links between AI development and its weaponization. The third factor is ...
In the current era of ascendant China and descendant US, it is the most likely candidate for a conflict the US military appears destined to lose. (Russia is too weak to be much of a threat; an incursion into Ukraine would likely be repelled by NATO) ...
more sophisticated stuff. It's a story that sounds similar to the civilian sector, where extensive state support puts China in a position to undercut the US and other advanced economies. And given that the most recent sales are to a NATO member, this could force a wedge into the alliance...
But Turkey is a NATO member so everything is fine. In politics hypocrisy is the main ingredient, so Nvidia selling 12 billion dollars AI accelerators to China at the same time that US is forcing sanctions on China on AI equipment, in fact makes total sense. Turkey has issues too but ...