to three neighbors who agreed to hold it in trust for the Brineys in the expectation that the Iowa Supreme Court would reverse the trial court’s judgment for Katko. But that didn’t happen. The judgment was affirmed on the ground that deadly force cannot be used to protect property only...
franchisees not to attempt to hire any current employees of other BKC franchisees for six months after the employee left the first BKC restaurant. The Plaintiff, an employee of BKC, alleged that the No-Hire Agreement violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by restricting competition to depress wages...
A flag burning in protest in Texas, said it violated the first amendment, passed a law making it illegal to burn a flag, but was resolved in second court case Citizens United v FEC (2010) A 2010 decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that independent expenditures are free spee...
Aug 17, 2023|Evidence,Recent SCOTUS Cases,Sixth Amendment,Supreme Court Opinions In a 6-3 opinion, the Supreme Court held that a defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights were not violated by the trial court’s admission of his co-defendant’s confession, during which his co-defendant stated th...
In this trial, the US Supreme Court ruled that the local bills passed in Hialeah, Florida, which prohibited animal sacrifice, violated the free exercise clause. The texts of these laws and the way they operated showed they were not neutral and generally applicable, but aimed at the Santeria ...
Amendment:-5th Amendment (Right to NO Self-incrimination or Double Jeopardy)Summary:-Man is interrogated-Not read his rights during interrogation-Due to not knowing his rights, he incriminates himself-Supreme Court declared that his rights were violatedImpact:-Police must tell citizens their rights-...
AMirandaviolation does not necessarily mean that an entire driving under the influence case will be thrown out. It does not even always mean that everything you said to the police will be excluded. Only those statements you made during the period when your rights were violated will be thrown...
The court also rejected plaintiff’s attempt to bootstrap the “any competent attorney’ statement into a claim that the plaintiff violated Indiana Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1 which specifically speaks to lawyer competence in representation. The Court found that since the plaintiff didn’t allege...
Holding: The Court of Appeals held that the deputies’ SWAT-style raid constituted unlawful seizure and violated the Fourth Amendment but that the deputies did not violate clearly established law regarding excessive force to execute a search warrant and were, therefore, entitled to qualified immunity...
the court said that a state statute that prohibited advertising of prescription drugs violated citizens' First Amendment rights to receive information Consolidated Edison Co. of New York Inc. v. Public Service Commission of New York - the court ruled that the Public Service Commission of New York...