California Jury Awards $31M in Age Discrimination Lawsuit More LOS ANGELES (AP) — A 58-year-old Southern California woman has been awarded $31 million in an age discrimination case against her former employer. Codie Rael of Ontario sued Washington-based Danaher Corp. and two subs...
Former SF mayoral candidate fighting Bay Area town to protect Flintstone House San Francisco Jury Finds Andrews International Illegally and Maliciously Called Plaintiff a G-D Terr Angela Alioto Takes on Lowe's in Discrimination Case Pregnancy Discrimination Case Gains Support Ralph Barbieri Press Release...
However, the statute of limitations for medical malpractice cases by underage victims is less forgiving. For children 5 and under, the statute of limitations is only the later of: 3 years after the malpractice, or the child’s 8th birthday. For minors 6 and older, the time limit for minor...
It is forbidden to permit a minor under the age of eighteen years to enter a saloon; and it is also forbidden to give or sell intoxicating liquor to anyone on an election day. Beyond these provisions, the general law leaves the control of the sale of liquor entirely to local authority....
itself." Proof that a person was operating a vehicle with a BAL of 0.08 percent or higher is enough, in and of itself, to establish that they were intoxicated for the purposes of a DUI. The BAL limit is 0.04 percent for a commercial driver and 0.02 percent for those under the age of...
In addition, the law provides that employees may use vacation, personal leave, or paid sick leave for any protected time off for jury duty, court appearances, and for victim time off. Finally, employers must provide written notice of the rights established under this bill to new hires, to ...
But that was not the final word.Although the jury found in her favor, the California Court of Appeal reversed the verdict, and she ended up with nothing. Why? Again, you must think in terms of the at-will rule. If an employer can fire you for no reason, then what difference does it...
”Binder v. Long Island Lighting Co.(2nd Cir. 1995) 57 F.3d 193. Proving pretext does not necessarily mean the jury must find the employer violated the law, but it is usually enough to get the matter to a jury, and then it is up to the jury to decide whether the employer violated...
The Jury agreed and awarded $5.4M in compensatory damages and a staggering punitive damages award of $150M against Farmers Insurance Exchange and Farmers Group Inc. $33.5 Million Court of Appeal Judgment for Retaliation Case Learn More About This Case $31.1 Million Verdict in Age Discrimination ...
A jury of her peers found him not guilty and this was a crystallizing moment to understand there is a clear choice – of life and death – between a Republican and a Democrat. Whereas Democratic San Francisco protected Mr. Zarate, the Republican Justice Department issued an arrest warrant. ...