DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED.; NOTES: RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE DOCKET 11/08/2024 DESCRIPTION: MOTION TO DISMISS FILED (AFTER RECORD).; NOTES: RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL Sparks v. Santa Monica Community College District et al. California Courts ...
Personal information described in the California Customer Records Statute (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.80(e)). This may include a name, signature, social security number, physical characteristics or description, address, telephone number, passport number, driver's license or state identification card numbe...
Customer Records Statute We may collect and use the personal information in this category to: respond to “contact us” or “live chat” requests; provide you with information about products and services requested; provide you with information about other Bridgestone and Firestone products and ...
This Privacy Notice for California Residents (“Privacy Notice”) supplements the information contained in Citadel’s Privacy Policy and provides eligible California residents with specific rights with respect to our collection, retention, and use of Personal Information. Any terms not defined in this ...
“shall not be tolled or extended for any reason” except as specified in the statute];Atwater Elementary School Dist. v. California Dept. of General Services, supra, 41 Cal.4th at p. 233 [“‘The Legislature could have easily stated it intended to abro...
Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund—Statute of Limitations—WCAB, denying reconsideration, affirmed WCJ’s finding that applicant’s application for Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) benefits… Appeals Board Panel Decisions Gonzalez (Francisco) v. Vermont Healthcare Center, LLC ...
B. Personal information categories listed in the California Customer Records statute (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.80(e)). A name, signature, physical characteristics or description, address, telephone number and payment information**. (**) Payment information: We use third-party payment processing compa...
[3] These considerations lead us to the conclusion, first, that no judicial estoppel exists here. We concede the rule of judicial estoppel by agreement, i.e., that when two spouses have stipulated to a fact upon the basis of which the court acts, the other party may not invoke the juri...
and therefore has its ordinary meaning, the challenged amendments made to the Monterey Hills Redevelopment Plan were not in excess of the powers of the city council under this statute. FN 2. These facts are taken from the trial court's findings of fact. FN 3. The parties stipulated that ...
In denying the motion to suppress, the trial judge took judicial notice of the fact "that those who are apprehended and are arrested many times attempt to avoid arrest by giving false identification." [Footnote 8] Petitioner points out that the officers had no idea how Miller gained access to...