that contain these chemicals. We sent product samples and packaging to be tested and it was determined that ourpackaging, not our tape,does contain chemical(s) at or above the threshold that require us to properly label our products in order to sell into the state of California in the Unite...
Shubb said the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and similar agencies in Europe haven't found a connection between the chemical and cancer. "The great weight of evidence indicates that glyphosate is not known to cause cancer," the judge said. The decision is "a very important rul...
may contain traces amounts of a chemical that could be on the growing list in California Proposition 65, aka -the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. This results in a right-to-know warning label for products sold in California. Since many of our products are sold in ...
The following is an example of the new warning label, which must be placed on the external packaging of product. The intent is to warn the individual prior to coming into contact with the listed chemical or chemicals prior to exposure. Alternatively, a truncated warning may be used: WARNING:...
Prop 65 was introduced in 1986 and requires companies to give clear warning if their product exposes an individual in the state of California to any detectable amount of more than 800 listed chemicals and chemical families and compounds known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity....
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).The earlier OEHHA ruling on 11 April was not a ban on BPA, but may have led to warning labels being added to products containing if they are considered to contain hazardous amounts of the chemical.What would warrant such labelling remains unclear....
This new law bans industries from discharging chemical suspected of causing cancer (carcinogens) or birth defects into water supplies. Some claim it will also require warning labels on everything that might cause cancer. A day of esoteric science and incomprehensible jargon was predicted. But Bruce...
In 2016, OEHHA provided businesses with the option to use “short-form” warnings on product labels and websites. In its initial statement of reasons for the proposed amendments, OEHHA stated that it seeks to address the following concerns: Businesses are not required to identify a chemical or...
this warning label. And some companies only put the labels on products that will be sold in California, so you won’t see them unless you buy the product there. Finally, older products sold prior to when the labeling requirement went into effect, may also contain the listed chemical(s). ...
chemical in an amount that is above a Proposition 65 threshold, then we will place the appropriate warning notice on the product label. However, in every case, the amount of lead or other chemical in a Thorne product that requires a Proposition 65 warning notice will be within the U.S. ...