1964, because the deputy handling the case was then on his honeymoon, appellant's counsel not only did not demand an immediate hearing on the demurrer and object to the continuance but consented thereto, and said nothing then or later--on the argument (November...
NAME: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FILING OF ANSWER BYDEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY TO THE COMPLAINTPURSUANT TO DEMURRER RULING; STATUS: SCHEDULED; DEPARTMENT: DEPT 20 / HALL OF JUSTICE HEARING 01/24/2025 NAME: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; STATUS: SCHEDULED; DEPARTMENT: DEPT 20 / HALL OF JUSTICE ...
In September 2011, the court sustained the demurrer with leave to amend.On October 3, 2011, the Kessler defendants moved to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration provision contained in the engagement agreement between Barsegian and Kessler & Kessler. The Kessler defendants also sought to ...
The fundamental issue posed by this mandamus proceeding to compel the sustaining of a general demurrer of petitioner, the City of Los Angeles, to the third cause of action of the second amended complaint of the real party in interest, Northrop Institute of Technology, is whether the recently en...
Infante, who dismissed all of Dunn’s claims in April but granted leave to amend with respect to three of them, overruled demurrers to two of the three amended claims. >>Read more Arbitrator revives Dunn lawsuit against State Bar June 20th, 2016 JAMS Arbitrator Edward A. Infante ruled ...
MATTER(S): ADDED TO CALENDAR FOR STATUS ON CLOSE OF ESTATE TENTATIVE RULING: OFF CALENDAR EXAMINER: SEAN BANG; LOCATION: CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE ROOM 204; JUDGE NAME: ROSS C. MOODY THE ESTATE OF MARY CANCILLA San Francisco County Superior Courts | San Francisco County Civic Center Courthous...
In September 2011, the court sustained the demurrer with leave to amend.On October 3, 2011, the Kessler defendants moved to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration provision contained in the engagement agreement between Barsegian and Kessler & Kessler. The Kessler defendants also sought to ...
Some think the Supreme Court may have put the Marin case on hold because the county pension system made a “general demurrer”, while the Alameda ruling was based on a trial court hearing with a long evidence record. The California Rule is a series of state court rulings believed to mean...
The trial court sustained the plaintiffs’ demurrer, without leave to amend, which the court of appeal affirmed in the reported case. The bottom line: The court held that the plaintiffs could not sue the City for the view obstruction because “’[U]nder California law, a landowner has no...
On appeal, “[w]e review the trial court’s rulings on an anti-SLAPP motion de novo, conducting an independent review of the entire record. [Citations.]” (Ibid.) 2. Plaintiffs cannot demonstrate a prima facie probability of success in their lawsuit under the second prong of the ...