加拿大颈椎规则可用于指导临床对外伤病人做颈椎影像学检查。应用该规则对病人进行风险评估可缩短其在急诊部门的留观时间。 使用说明 加拿大颈椎规则由3个部分组成:3个高风险因素、5个低风险因素和病人旋转颈部的能力。 使用流程:1.先判断有无高风险因素,若有高风险因素,则无需判断低风险因素。2.若无高风险因素,则继...
Canadian C-Spine RulePaul S. Auerbach
Canadian C-spine rule A prediction rule consisting of a cluster of signs and symptoms that help to rule out the need for a radiograph to diagnose a spinal fracture in a patient who comes to the emergency department after receiving an injury to the head or neck. Medical Dictionary, © ...
Canadian C-Spine Rule The Canadian C-Spine Rules (CCR) is an assessment tool used to rule out cervical spine injury in low-risk patients, obviating the need for radiography. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] Step 1 Is there any high-risk factor that mandates radiography? These include the ...
The sensitivities of NEXUS criteria, Canadian C-spine, and modified Canadian C-spine rule were 93.4%, 100.0% and 100.0%, respectively. Conclusions: The modified Canadian C-spine rule has fewer variables than the original Canadian C-spine rule and is entirely based on physical examination, which...
Rule, theCanadian C-Spine Rule, andCanadian CT Head Ruleand as the Principal Investigator for the landmark OPALS Studies for prehospital care. Dr. Stiell is the Principal Investigator for 1 of 3 Canadian sites in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) which is funded by CIHR, NIH, H...
The resultant model and final Canadian C-Spine Rule comprises 3 main questions: (1) is there any high-risk factor present that mandates radiography (ie, age >/=65 years, dangerous mechanism, or paresthesias in extremities)? (2) is there any low-risk factor present that allows safe ...
Older and part‐time physicians were less likely to have seen the Canadian C‐Spine Rule but not less likely to use it once they had seen it. Targeting hard‐to‐reach subpopulations while stressing the safety and convenience of these rules is most likely to increase use of new CDRs. 展开...
A comparison study between the NEXUS Criteria and the Canadian C-Spine Rule suggested that the NEXUS criteria are less sensitive (90.7 vs. 95-99%), though there remains some controversy over the results and methodology. References Hoffman et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule...
The article focuses on the prospective observational study conducted in two emergency department (ED) in Great Britain examining the use of Canadian Cervical Spine Rule (CCR) in patients with acute blunt neck trauma. It mentions that C-spine radiography was carried out on 987 patients with eight...