在编程中,遇到“excess elements in array initializer”警告通常意味着在初始化数组时提供了比数组定义时指定的长度更多的元素。下面是针对这个问题的详细解答: 1. 解释“excess elements in array initializer”警告的含义 这个警告表示在初始化数组时,你提供的元素数量超过了数组定义时指定的容量
test.c:7:2: warning: (near initializationfor‘array1’) [enabled bydefault] test.c:7:2: warning: excess elementsinarray initializer [enabled bydefault] test.c:7:2: warning: (near initializationfor‘array1’) [enabled bydefault] test.c:7:2: warning: excess elementsinarray initializer [en...
excess elements in char array initializer 的意思是：在char数组初始化时，设置了多余的元素。如：const char ChDay[] = { //这里定义的是一个一维字符数组，并进行初始化，一维数组的元素只能是单个的字符，而下面的数据却是字符串，所以，在编译时会报错误。"","初一","初二","初三","初四"...
如果部分初始化数组,剩余的元素会被编译器初始化为 0。 如果初始化列表的项数多于数组元素个数,gcc 5.4 编译器只会警告有多余的元素:(warning: excess elements in array initializer)。 5. 让编译器自动推导数组大小 演示demo: int main(void) { const int days[] = {31,28,31,30,31,30,31,31,30,31}...
C语言程序设计(第4版)》-CodeBlocks常见编程错误英汉对照-051 2.1.2.5 Code::Blocks常见编译错误和警告信息的英汉对照 Code::Blocks常见编译错误和警告信息的英汉对照如表2-1所示。
prog.c: In function 'main': prog.c:7:25: warning: excess elements in array initializer int arr[2] = { 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 }; ^ prog.c:7:25: note: (near initialization for 'arr') prog.c:7:29: warning: excess elements in array initializer int arr[2] = { 10, 20, 30, ...
arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/mach-mini2440.c:198: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 开始以为是输错代码,搞了一个上午都没有搞明白。 到了下午,通过查找网上的资料(还真难找),再对比原来2.6.32内核中外国爱好者编写的mach-mini2440.c 文件,隐约知道是头文件的问题。
test.c:Infunction ‘foo’:test.c:<n>:3:error:variable-sized object may not be initialized int a[n]={0};^test.c:<n>:15:warning:excess elementsinarray initializer int a[n]={0};^test.c:<n>:15:note:(near initializationfor‘a’) ...
array-qualifiers -Wno-div-by-zero -Wdouble-promotion -Wduplicated-branches -Wduplicated-cond -Wempty-body -Wenum-compare -Wno-endif-labels -Wexpansion-to-defined -Werror -Werror=* -Wfatal-errors -Wfloat-equal -Wformat -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-contains-nul -Wno-format-extra-args -Wformat-...
That way if the initializer changes in the future, you won’t have to remember to update the length, and there is no risk in forgetting to include an extra element to hold the null terminator. C-style strings will decay In lesson 17.8 -- C-style array decay, we discussed how C-style...