For the first time, new recommended values for NIST SRM3126a are reported(δ^(56)Fe = 0.363 ± 0.006,2SE, 95% CI; and δ^(57)Fe = 0.534 ± 0.010, 2SE).Chuanwei ZhuState Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral ResourcesWenning LuYongsheng HeShan KeHongjie WuLinan Zhang地球...
Similar results were observed when model comparison was performed with the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (Supplementary Fig. S3c). In other words, model comparison analysis indicated that the effect of rPPC cTBS could be better explained as a change in bias rather than a change in ...
2). The RD between LLM-assisted and LLM-only assessments was 1.6% (95% CI: 0.0–3.2%; p = 0.05; Table 2), indicating that human review corrected some errors, leading to improved accuracy. The PABAK (Prevalence-Adjusted Bias-Adjusted Kappa) among the four investigators was 0.88, ...
The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for these slopes were generated using the bootstrapped distribution (1000 times). (2) To evaluate distribution differences, we also compared the absolute effect size changes between sexes using Wilcoxon rank sum test. We corrected for multiple testing with the ...
To compound the issue, some operate under the misconception that if errors are made in such an internal investigation then an independent review of the case materials will allow discrepancies to be corrected. Unfortunately this presupposes that the initial investigation was performed, that it was ...
Results No statistically significant difference in the composite endpoint of stroke and systemic embolism was found between apixaban versus dabigatran 150mg/d (odds-ratio: 1.03, 95%CI [0.75;1.42 ] ), between apixaban versus dabigatran 110mg/d (0.75 95%CI [0.55;1.02 ] ), and between apixaban...
Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) NHANES Ref. 2.48d 4.41 5.64 7.63 7.13 (0.99–6.21)e (1.79–9.61) (2.41–13.20) (3.05–19.10) (2.65–19.13) Sim. Ref. 1.080f 1.018 1.067 1.072 1.077 (1.078–1.082) (0.986–1.050) (1.036–1.098) (1.043–1.102) (1.046–1.110) Bias-Corrected NHANESg Ref....
Correction: This article was corrected on October 19, 2017, to fix errors in Table 1, including deletion of a reference that did not meet inclusion criteria, and corresponding changes in the text. This article has been corrected online. Published Online: August 20, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol...
(Sona Systems). The participants took part in the study in return for course credit or payment. All participants were native Hebrew speakers of Israeli nationality and had normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Using a power analysis software (G*Power; Faul et al.,2007), we determined that ...
Since humans are known to exhibit bias on all dimensions, one possibility is that app makers, through their efforts (e.g., dataset curation, fine-tuning, and filtering), have selectively corrected for racial and gender bias. These particular minority groups might garner more attention and ...