I want to set up cross account access to an S3 bucket for AWS Glue in another account to crawl. We have two accounts in our environment (A & B): AccountA has an S3 bucket with ACL permissions (i.e. administrator prefers not to use bucket policies) allowing AccountB to both 'List o...
源bucket 和目标 bucket 可以在同一个 Region(Same-Region Replication),也可以在不同 Region(Cross-Region Replication),可以在同一个 AWS account 下,也可以分属不同的 account。 注意:中国区和 Global 区之间不能使用 S3 replication 一个源 bucket 可以同时对应多个目标 bucket。 默认情况下,replication 只支持...
假设张三做为总管理员,在account-a中创建了一个S3 bucket,名字是security-boundary-test,而做为account-a的管理员李四无权修改这个bucket,我们只需在account-a中生成一个policy, 内容如下: {"Version":"2012-10-17","Statement":[{"Sid":"VisualEditor0","Effect":"Allow","Action":"*"...
打开xyz-crossaccount-bucket存储桶,点击“权限”标签,然后在存储桶策略部分点击“编辑”。 在编辑存储桶策略中,设置一下策略,以允许abc账号下的角色s3crr_role_for_abc_to_xyz执行复制任务。 { "Version": "2012-10-17", "Id": "PolicyForDestinationBucket", "Statement": [ { "Sid": "Permissions on ...
在这一页将`Block new public bucket policies `和`Block public and cross-account access if bucket has public policies`这两项反选 点击`Next`后再点击`Create bucket`就可以完成bucket的创建。 enable and configure static website hosting 点击打开你新建的bucket,选中`Properties`标签栏,点击打开`Static web...
Describe the bug When doing a cross account upload to a bucket via the aws s3 cp command where the current IAM role is in one account and the bucket has encryption with a customer KMS key in another account, and all the access to the buc...
Bucket Policies - bucket wide rules from the S3 console - allows cross account Object Access Control (ACL) - finer grain Bucket Access Control List (ACL) - less common The user IAM permissions allow it OR the resource policy ALLOWS it ...
{ "Version": "2012-10-17", "Statement": [ { "Effect": "Allow", "Action": "s3:*", "Resource": [ "arn:aws:s3:::cross-account-bucket", "arn:aws:s3:::cross-account-bucket/*" ] } ] } If you require DynamoDB access, create an IAM policy that specifies permissions to access ...
"arn:aws:s3:::kul-my-bucket" ] } ] } Wondering if it is possible or should I try it differently? Is anything similar to this possible for my case by providing the condition in the policy: "Condition": { "StringLike": { "aws:accountId": [ ...
resource "aws_iam_role" "crossrole" { name = "CrossAccount_Role" assume_role_policy = jsonencode( { "Version": "2012-10-17", "Statement": [ { "Effect": "Allow", "Principal": { "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::{{A账号的数字ID}}:root" ...