Right now this is my code where result is the array of arrays: result.map(array => { return array.reduce((a, b) => (a + b)) / array.length; }) const result = [ [1], [2, 3], [4, 5, 6, 7] ] console.log(result.map(array => { return array.reduce((a, b) => (...
return averages; } Is there a better way to go about this problem? Am I totally off in what I am trying to do here? So if you need more performance you have to use for loop. For loop is faster then forEach and forEach is faster then for in loop. Here you can f...
import thepassiveinvestor as pi # Collect data from a set of ETFs and compare them etf_comparison = pi.collect_data(['VOO', 'QQQ', 'ARKG', 'VUG', 'SCHA', 'VWO'], comparison=True) # Show the comparison etf_comparison Which returns the following: VOOQQQARKGVUGSCHAVWO ('sector_hold...
The returns are projected in after-inflation real terms, in local currency and assume a return on U.S. cash holdings of plus 0.2% a year. U.S. cash returns were pegged at -0.4% per year in the last forecast. GMO assumes U.S. inflation will "mean revert to long-term inflation of ...
Detailed Trend Components of the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust Fund Price Forecast & Prognosis Walletinvestor.com Most Traded Stocks Morningstar International Shares Active Etf (manag (MSTR) Stock ForecastSPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Stock ForecastInvesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) Stock Forecast...
}returnzPrime; }console.log(fill(x));console.log(fill(y));console.log(fill(z));console.log(fill(q)); You can do something like this using simple iteration. functionfillMissing(arr) {// array for storing resultvarres = [];// iterate over the arrayfor(i =0; i < arr.length; i+...
You could use a combination ofObject.keysto get each item in thecontenders, then usemapto create a new array from the results: functiongetAvg(data) {returndata.reduce(function(p, c) {returnp + c; }) / data.length; }varinput = {categories: ["Cat 1","Cat 2","Cat 3","Cat 4"...