If a scientist tells us that we are safe from an earthquake and then a deadly earthquake occurs, we are rightfully angry. How could that scientist not look at all the evidence? How could that scientist not end the statement with a comment about the uncertainty involved with such a statement?
Atheists in the Pulpit: Clergy Who Are Non-Believers Pascal’s Wager: Is It a Good Bet? Why Stephen Hawking Said There Is No God Does the Soul Exist? Conundrums, Questions, and Quandaries
ANALYSIS: Book explores how higher ed can be biased against religious students “Religious diversity,” is good for higher education, according to an atheist professor. West Virginia University sociologist Christopher Scheitle explores this topic in his new book, “The Faithful Scientist,” out now ...
Hannam sketches how polemicists like Thomas Huxley, John William Draper, and Andrew Dickson White, all with their own anti-Christian axes to grind, managed to shape the still current idea that the Middle Ages was devoid of science and reason. And how it was not until real historians bothered...
We have all heard ofLeonardo Da Vinci(1452 – 1519) the great Italian inventor, painter and scientist. That is the way it should be; there is no doubting his unparalleled genius. But how many of us know that the person, who can rightly be called the father of automation predated Da Vi...