Cochrane ReviewsCochrane risk‐of‐bias toolindividually randomized parallel‐group trialsintended interventionsoutcome dataoutcome measurementrandomized trialsJulian PT HigginsJelena SavoviMatthew J PageRoy G ElbersJonathan AC SterneJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd...
trials can, however, be undermined by flaws in design, conduct, analyses, and reporting, leading to underestimation or overestimation of the true intervention effect (bias).2 However, it is usually impossible to know the extent to which biases have affected the results of a particular trial. Sy...
Re: ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions - BMJ 被引量: 1发表: 2020年 Evaluating risk of bias using ROBINS-I tool in nonrandomized studies of adjuvanted influenza vaccine bias (RoB) by means of the ROBINS-I (Reduction of Bias In Non-ran...
Teaching about therapy is the cornerstone of most curricula in evidence-based medicine. In order to address this core topic, we walk through background information and teaching techniques addressing (1) framing a therapy question, (2) assessing the risk of bias in trials of interventions, (3) ...
The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized clinical trials was introduced in 2008 and has frequently been commented on and used in systematic reviews. We wanted to evaluate the tool by reviewing published comments on its strengths and challenges and by describing and analysing how the tool is...
Effect of probiotics on body weight and body-mass index: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials 20. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343... Q Zhang,Y Wu...
To assess the quality of randomized controlled urological trials conducted by Korean medical institutions. Quality assessment was conducted by using the Jadad scale; in addition, the van Tulder scale and the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool were used as individual indices. All assessments were...
Even Cochrane Reviews, however, allow authors to use a range of methodologies and approaches to studies on risk of bias, limiting comparability across risk–outcome pairs19. Tools have been produced to help standardize consideration of evidence, such as Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, ...
Assessing the efficacy and safety of STOP (successful treatment for paranoia)—an app-based cognitive bias modification therapy for paranoia: a randomised clinical trial protocol Jenny Yiend, Rayan Taher, Carolina Fialho, Chloe Hampshire, Che-Wei Hsu, Thomas Kabir, Jeroen Keppens, Philip...
The STOP study is a double-blind, superiority, three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT). People are eligible for the trial if they experience persistent, distressing paranoia, as assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales, and show evidence of an interpretation bias towards threat on...