Article 41 of the ICJ Statute is the expression of an inherent power of international arbitral tribunals and judicial bodies; also the conditions for the indication of provisional measures by the ICJ are similar with those usually applied in arbitration. Yet, the Court's competence to act proprio...
Statute of the International Court of Justice (1945) 15 UNCIO 355, Article 38(1)(b); North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v Netherlands) (judgment) [1969] ICJ Rep 3, para 77; Nicaragua (merits) (n 28) paras 184, 186....
ICJ Arbitral Award (Honduras v Nicaragua) [1960] ICJ Rep 192, 208. 77. Mahiou (2006), Art 24 MN 10. 78. UN Office of Legal Affairs (2003), p. 65; Aust (2013), p. 151. 79. “For each State ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to this Statute after the deposit of the...
(3) decision led to the finding that the ICC may assert jurisdiction in the event that at least one element of the crime is committed on the territory of a state party to theRome Statute.11This is important because Myanmar had not ratified theRome Statute,and was not a member state of ...
Article 38 of the Statute of the ICJ should be regarded as the comprehensive and complete sources of international law.<br/> A、正确<br/> B、错误
“General Principles of Law” is whether general principles of law “formed within the international legal system” could be regarded as part of Article 38(1)(c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which provides that the ICJ shall apply “the general principles of ...
This article offers an interpretation of Article 38(1)(d) of the ICJ Statute based on the formal pronouncements of international criminal courts and tribunals, distilled from their judgments. It considers that the qualification 'subsidiary' is meant neither to distinguish the means from the primary...
[35]ICJ(International Commission of Jurist)在评论1994国际法委员会制定的《罗马规约草案》时,也认为不应将侵略罪纳入国际刑事法院的管辖范围,因为:1,联合国大会3314号决议已经将侵略罪定义为国家行为,但国际刑事法院属人管辖的范围仅限于自然人;2,而且在无权对安理会对侵略行为已经发生的断定进行复议的情况下,国际...
【摘要】《国际刑事法院罗马规约》第19条是关于质疑法院管辖权和案件可受理性程序的主要条款之一。它规定了有权进行质疑的当事方、质疑的内容和时间限制、由法庭的什么机构对此质疑作出裁决以及质疑对法院行为的影响。国家可以质疑法院管辖权的这一做法是国际刑法的新发展,也是法院补充性原则的重要组成部分。
Article 46 ICJ StatutepublicityhearingstransparencyCommentary to Article 46 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.von Schorlemer, SabineTzanakopoulos, AntoniosSocial Science Electronic Publishing