Arizona Supreme Court declines case challenging tuition tax creditsChristian Palmer
The court of appeals found that the court room observer had violated Rule 122, Ariz. R. Sup. Ct., under which cameras in a courtroom “must be placed to avoid showing jurors in any manner.” At least in a criminal matter, where it is shown the jury considered extraneous matter in maki...
All legal documents that can be utilized after your family law case has ended. SEE MORE Evidence Gathering All legal documents to help build your family law case by securing information, documents, and other evidence. SEE MORE WORK PROCESS ...
The meaning of MIRANDA V. ARIZONA is 384 U.S. 436 (1966), specified a code of conduct for police interrogations of criminal suspects held in custody. Known as the Miranda warnings, these guidelines include informing arrested persons prior to questioning
(1976). The presence of parents or their consent to a waiver of rights is only one of the elements to be considered by the trial court in determining whether the juvenile's statement was voluntary and the juvenile intelligently comprehended his rights. State v. Hardy, 107 Ariz. 583,491 P...
He took time out of his day and busy schedule to go to court on my behalf. It was the first time I ever needed an 'advocate' on my side and I cannot even begin to write how much it meant to me to have him help me on this case. Anyone would be fortunate to have him on ...
Arizona Supreme Court hears CityNorth case; $97.4M in incentives challengedChristian Palmer
Arizona prosecutors asked grand jurors not to indict Trump in fake electors case, court records show The Arizona grand jury thatindicted 18 Republican supportersof former President Donald Trump who falsely claimed he won the state in the 2020 election wanted to consider also charging Trump, ...
The Arizona Supreme Court says the state can enforce its long-dormant law making abortion illegal in all cases except when a mother’s life is at stake.
He contended in assignment No. 1 that the court erred in ruling that defendant's statement made while under the influence of sodium amytal "was not new and additional evidence under the statute." Counsel forthrightly admits that he has found no case which sustains his position but that all ...