a : a reason for or against something b : a discussion in which arguments are presented : debate 2 : an angry disagreement : quarrel Legal Definition argument noun ar·gu·ment 1 : a reason or the reasoning given for or against a matter under discussion compare evidence, ...
I then suggest a strategy for arguing against disquotationalism and other forms of deflationism that focuses rather on the explanatory role of truth in accounts of meaning, in particular on the way that the theories of meaning compatible with deflationism handle embedded uses of sentences....
Smythe, W. E. (1990). Mental representation and meaning: Arguments against the computational view. In W. J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, R. van Hezewijk, & S. Terwee, Recent trends in theoretical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 261–266). New York: Springer-Verlag....
(a) Describe the benefits and costs of globalization. (b) Give examples of how globalization has helped or harmed individual nations and the World economy. What are the arguments for and against a country participating in free trade? Give the arguments for and against free trade agreements. ...
Answer to: Present arguments for and against supporting free trade and protectionism. Use at least two countries as examples. By signing up, you'll...
Then he added an important qualification: "Generally speaking, the Government weighs up carefullythearguments forandagainst an act of interventionism in any sector of our economy and on the demand or supply side in the light of present and future circumstances. ...
However, such arguments would only cover parts of the continent, thus going against the holistic approach of RoA, and they would require using a broader understanding of 'attachments' as grounds for justifying rights for parts of Antarctica. In contrast, we construct an argument for accepting RoA...
It concentrates discussion on arguments of Charniak, Hayes, Putnam and Bobrow and Winograd; and suggests that many of the arguments against semantic primitives are based on no clear views about what the defenders are arguing for . The proponents of semantic primitives must share blame for this, ...
The major arguments against the Ricardo-Barro effect are due to what are perceived as the unrealistic assumptions on which the theory is based. These assumptions include the existence of perfect capital markets and the ability for individuals to borrow and save whenever they want. Additionally, ther...
Ann Beeson, associate legal director of the ACLU, and Mark Segal, of the Philadelphia Gay News, address members of the press outside of the Supreme Court March 2, 2004, the day the ACLU argued an internet censorship case against US Attorney General John Ashcroft, concerning a law that the...