由下文的another可知"一回事"使用one thing,主语To say something是单数,因此be动词使用is. 故答案为:is one thing.说是一回事,做是另一回事。对于汉译英这种题,要分析句子意思,再从结构上和意义上对答案进行确定。结果一 题目 【题目】To say something_and to do it is another.说是一
题目结构为并列的不定式短语作主语,逻辑主语为“to say something”和“to do it”,均视为单数。根据主谓一致原则,动词需用第三人称单数形式。第一个空填“is”构成“To say something is one thing”;第二个空受括号提示“(be)”影响,需用其正确形式“is”,形成“to do it is another”,符合语法和惯用表达...
To say something is one thing,to do it is another.说归说，做归做。说是一码事，做是另一码事。说是一回事,做是另一回事言行不一说是一回事,做是另一回事.说一套，做一套。说起来容易做起来难因为这里需要主语。a、b、c、d中只有动词不定式短语可以做主语。
Be likely to do something is another way to say be l___ to do something.的答案是什么.用刷刷题APP,拍照搜索答疑.刷刷题(shuashuati.com)是专业的大学职业搜题找答案,刷题练习的工具.一键将文档转化为在线题库手机刷题,以提高学习效率,是学习的生产力工具
答案解析 查看更多优质解析 解答一 举报 不定式做主语是很常见的实在不能理解,可以用这个方法.谓语动词前面的一般都是主语.这个句子里的谓语动词是be(is) 问题补充之回答:something是不定代词,做主句中to say 的宾语,做从句中 be one thing的主语. 解析看不懂?免费查看同类题视频解析查看解答 更多答案(2) ...
解析 不定式做主语是很常见的 实在不能理解,可以用这个方法.谓语动词前面的一般都是主语.这个句子里的谓语动词是be(is) 问题补充之回答:something是不定代词,做主句中to say 的宾语,做从句中 be one thing的主语.结果一 题目 To say something is one thing,to do it is anotherto say 和 to do 为什么...
结果一 题目 To say something ___ one thing, and to do it ___ another. A. 答案 C[名师解析] 本题要表达“说是一回事,做又是一回事”。不定式“to say something”和“to do something”分别做主语,谓语动词be动词应用单数。选项A、B均有误。所以正确答案为C。相关推荐 ...
This article examines Arthur Waley’s abridged translation of “Journey to the West”, titled “Monkey”, and its influence on magic wind narrativity using narrative theory and (re)framing concepts. The research categorises the narrative significance of the magical wind in the source text and high...
It will work the exact same way as with a regular function. Quent automatically awaits any coroutines, even a coroutine that the function passed to .foreach() may return. Quent is written in C (using Cython) to minimize it's overhead as much as possible. As a basic example, take ...
α,β: Doαandβrefer to agents’ beliefs or their degrees of belief? That is, does the normative constraint govern agents’ beliefs or their degrees of belief? 3. D: What kind of deontic operator features in the normative constraint? Is it the indefeasible ‘ought to’ operator, the de...