In the meantime, zoos can produce helpful scientific research.However, as is often the case, zoos are harmful to animals' physical health. Zoo animals are often reported to suffer from problems not seen in the wild, such as anxiety in giraffes. Worse still, zoo is psychologically damaging to...
the mounta-ins,or any place they like.But in my opinion,it is good to keep animals in zoos.Firstly,zoos are places for people to see many kinds of animals from over the world.Without zoos,most people would never see a real bear or tiger.Secondly,zoos look after animals very well.The...
It is not necessary to keep animals in the zoo. Because animals are restricted to limited spaces and cannot freely explore and migrate, which may negatively impact their physical and mental health. The environment in the zoo often cannot fully replicate the animal's natural habitat, which can ...
Zoos are more harmful than helpful because they restrict animals to enclosed habitats, they weaken the animals primal instincts, and they cause the animals stress which lead to mental and physical health issues. 749 Words 3 Pages Satisfactory Essays Read More The Benefits Of Zoos And Animals The...
They can breed these animals in captivity and then reintroduce them back into the wild.But zoos do have their problems. Not all zoos are created equal. While some are clean and well-staffed, others aren't. Keeping animals captive can be terrible for their physical and psychological health. ...
Some animals in cages don't even have much space to walk around. Living in the zoo is bad for an animal's mental(心的) and physical health.We should hot have roo, Animals in soos should return to nature because nature is their bome. When I was a kid. I liked visiting zoos. But ...
Check out Band 7, 8, & 9 sample answers for the IELTS Agree Disagree essay: We No Longer Need to have Animals Kept in Zoos to familiarize with this essay type.
Pro 2: Zoos produce helpful scientific research. Read More. Con 2: Zoos are detrimental to the animals’ physical health. Read More. Pro 3: Zoos save species from extinction and other dangers. Read More. Con 3: Zoo confinement is psychologically harmful to animals. Read More. Pro Arguments...
Pro 2: Zoos produce helpful scientific research. Read More. Con 2: Zoos are detrimental to the animals’ physical health. Read More. Pro 3: Zoos save species from extinction and other dangers. Read More. Con 3: Zoo confinement is psychologically harmful to animals. Read More. Pro Arguments...
More recent descriptions of QoL usually encompass notions that extend beyond physical health to include the psychological state [16,29]. In people, the level of independence and personal beliefs are often also included [26]. For both people and animals, QoL is proposed by some to encompass soci...